PortfoliosLab logo
WM vs. UNP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between WM and UNP is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

WM vs. UNP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Waste Management, Inc. (WM) and Union Pacific Corporation (UNP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WM:

0.37

UNP:

-0.20

Sortino Ratio

WM:

0.57

UNP:

-0.19

Omega Ratio

WM:

1.08

UNP:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

WM:

0.56

UNP:

-0.29

Martin Ratio

WM:

1.26

UNP:

-0.75

Ulcer Index

WM:

5.31%

UNP:

7.55%

Daily Std Dev

WM:

20.31%

UNP:

23.84%

Max Drawdown

WM:

-77.85%

UNP:

-59.44%

Current Drawdown

WM:

-6.06%

UNP:

-11.50%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WM:

$89.49B

UNP:

$136.37B

EPS

WM:

$6.63

UNP:

$11.10

PE Ratio

WM:

33.54

UNP:

20.56

PEG Ratio

WM:

2.90

UNP:

2.87

PS Ratio

WM:

3.90

UNP:

5.62

PB Ratio

WM:

10.35

UNP:

8.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

WM:

$22.92B

UNP:

$24.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WM:

$8.49B

UNP:

$11.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

WM:

$6.60B

UNP:

$12.48B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WM achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly higher than UNP's 0.68% return. Over the past 10 years, WM has outperformed UNP with an annualized return of 18.50%, while UNP has yielded a comparatively lower 10.68% annualized return.


WM

YTD

10.66%

1M

-4.23%

6M

-0.72%

1Y

7.54%

5Y*

20.37%

10Y*

18.50%

UNP

YTD

0.68%

1M

2.73%

6M

-3.95%

1Y

-4.68%

5Y*

11.03%

10Y*

10.68%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WM vs. UNP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WM is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WM is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WM is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WM is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WM is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WM is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

UNP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UNP is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UNP is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UNP is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UNP is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UNP is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UNP is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WM vs. UNP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Waste Management, Inc. (WM) and Union Pacific Corporation (UNP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current WM Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the UNP Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WM and UNP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

WM vs. UNP - Dividend Comparison

WM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than UNP's 2.33% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
1.38%1.49%1.56%1.66%1.38%1.85%1.80%2.09%1.97%2.31%2.89%2.92%
UNP
Union Pacific Corporation
2.33%2.32%2.12%2.45%1.70%1.86%2.05%2.21%1.85%2.17%2.81%1.60%

Drawdowns

WM vs. UNP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WM drawdown since its inception was -77.85%, which is greater than UNP's maximum drawdown of -59.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WM and UNP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

WM vs. UNP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Waste Management, Inc. (WM) is 4.78%, while Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) has a volatility of 8.63%. This indicates that WM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UNP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

WM vs. UNP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Waste Management, Inc. and Union Pacific Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20212022202320242025
6.02B
6.03B
(WM) Total Revenue
(UNP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WM vs. UNP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Waste Management, Inc. and Union Pacific Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
39.4%
45.3%
(WM) Gross Margin
(UNP) Gross Margin
WM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Waste Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.37B and revenue of 6.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.

UNP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Union Pacific Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.73B and revenue of 6.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.3%.

WM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Waste Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.01B and revenue of 6.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.

UNP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Union Pacific Corporation reported an operating income of 2.37B and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.3%.

WM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Waste Management, Inc. reported a net income of 637.00M and revenue of 6.02B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.

UNP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Union Pacific Corporation reported a net income of 1.63B and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in a net margin of 27.0%.