WM vs. RSG
WM (Waste Management, Inc.) and RSG (Republic Services, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Waste Management industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, WM returned 15.19%/yr vs 17.37%/yr for RSG. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
WM vs. RSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WM achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly higher than RSG's -0.76% return. Over the past 10 years, WM has underperformed RSG with an annualized return of 15.19%, while RSG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.37% annualized return.
WM
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- -5.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.43%
- 5Y*
- 11.30%
- 10Y*
- 15.19%
RSG
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- -0.76%
- 6M
- -1.29%
- 1Y
- -15.67%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 15.52%
- 10Y*
- 17.37%
WM vs. RSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 0.43% | 10.50% | 14.28% | 16.20% | -4.49% | 43.82% | 5.46% | 30.45% | 5.32% | 24.46% |
RSG Republic Services, Inc. | -0.76% | 6.44% | 23.03% | 29.64% | -6.16% | 47.03% | 9.53% | 26.62% | 8.85% | 20.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between WM and RSG is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1998 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, WM and RSG have become more correlated (0.82) than their long-term average of 0.61, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
WM:
$88.50B
RSG:
$64.63B
WM:
$6.91
RSG:
$6.98
WM:
31.67
RSG:
29.96
WM:
2.59
RSG:
2.11
WM:
3.48
RSG:
3.89
WM:
8.83
RSG:
5.40
WM:
$25.41B
RSG:
$16.70B
WM:
$5.61B
RSG:
$3.80B
WM:
$6.96B
RSG:
$4.89B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WM vs. RSG — Risk / Return Rank
WM
RSG
WM vs. RSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Waste Management, Inc. (WM) and Republic Services, Inc. (RSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WM | RSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.87 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | -0.78 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | -1.26 | +0.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WM vs. RSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WM drawdown since its inception was -77.85%, which is greater than RSG's maximum drawdown of -65.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WM and RSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WM | RSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.85% | -65.99% | -11.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.70% | -20.28% | +3.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | -22.54% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.14% | -22.54% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.07% | -34.02% | +3.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.49% | -18.09% | +7.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.68% | -11.84% | -5.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.73% | 12.41% | -4.68% |
Volatility
WM vs. RSG - Volatility Comparison
Waste Management, Inc. (WM) and Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) have volatilities of 6.58% and 6.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WM | RSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.58% | 6.36% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.22% | 13.83% | +0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.24% | 18.80% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 18.18% | +0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.57% | 19.11% | +0.46% |
Dividends
WM vs. RSG - Dividend Comparison
WM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than RSG's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSG Republic Services, Inc. | 1.17% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.72% | 1.74% | 2.00% | 1.97% | 2.17% | 2.64% |
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 1.62% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 1.38% | 1.85% | 1.80% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 2.31% | 2.89% |
Financials
WM vs. RSG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Waste Management, Inc. and Republic Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WM vs. RSG - Profitability Comparison
WM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
RSG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.11B and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.
RSG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 830.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.
WM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a net income of 723.00M and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
RSG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a net income of 525.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WM and RSG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WM has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to RSG (6.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WM dropped -77.85% vs RSG's -65.99%.
WM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.28 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WM and RSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer