WM vs. CLH
Compare and contrast key facts about Waste Management, Inc. (WM) and Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WM or CLH.
Correlation
The correlation between WM and CLH is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
WM vs. CLH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
WM:
0.80
CLH:
0.60
WM:
1.16
CLH:
1.00
WM:
1.18
CLH:
1.13
WM:
1.23
CLH:
0.84
WM:
2.79
CLH:
2.84
WM:
5.23%
CLH:
5.76%
WM:
18.34%
CLH:
27.04%
WM:
-77.85%
CLH:
-95.54%
WM:
-0.48%
CLH:
-17.23%
Fundamentals
WM:
$91.69B
CLH:
$11.74B
WM:
$6.82
CLH:
$7.43
WM:
33.44
CLH:
29.34
WM:
2.82
CLH:
188.43
WM:
$22.06B
CLH:
$5.89B
WM:
$7.62B
CLH:
$1.62B
WM:
$6.01B
CLH:
$1.11B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WM achieves a 13.00% return, which is significantly higher than CLH's -5.27% return. Over the past 10 years, WM has outperformed CLH with an annualized return of 17.78%, while CLH has yielded a comparatively lower 15.37% annualized return.
WM
13.00%
7.85%
9.36%
11.61%
14.78%
17.78%
CLH
-5.27%
-10.46%
-10.98%
19.49%
20.09%
15.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WM vs. CLH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
WM
CLH
WM vs. CLH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Waste Management, Inc. (WM) and Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WM vs. CLH - Dividend Comparison
WM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, while CLH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 1.32% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 1.38% | 1.85% | 1.80% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 2.31% | 2.89% | 2.92% |
CLH Clean Harbors, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WM vs. CLH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WM drawdown since its inception was -77.85%, smaller than the maximum CLH drawdown of -95.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WM and CLH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WM vs. CLH - Volatility Comparison
Waste Management, Inc. (WM) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) at 6.46%. This indicates that WM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
WM vs. CLH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Waste Management, Inc. and Clean Harbors, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities