PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEBNF vs. NU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WEBNF vs. NU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westpac Banking Corp (WEBNF) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEBNF achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly higher than NU's -28.73% return.


WEBNF

1D
-0.21%
1M
-4.68%
YTD
0.20%
6M
7.01%
1Y
24.75%
3Y*
29.50%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*
14.12%

NU

1D
-8.16%
1M
-17.38%
YTD
-28.73%
6M
-32.25%
1Y
-0.58%
3Y*
19.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEBNF vs. NU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WEBNF
Westpac Banking Corp
0.20%39.75%34.48%5.37%10.13%2.27%
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
-28.73%61.58%24.37%104.67%-56.61%-9.20%

Correlation

The correlation between WEBNF and NU is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021

0.15

The correlation between WEBNF and NU shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (3 years) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WEBNF:

$62.48B

NU:

$58.58B

EPS

WEBNF:

$5.69

NU:

$0.65

PE Ratio

WEBNF:

4.43

NU:

18.38

PEG Ratio

WEBNF:

0.54

NU:

0.28

PS Ratio

WEBNF:

0.80

NU:

3.34

PB Ratio

WEBNF:

0.88

NU:

4.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

WEBNF:

$77.68B

NU:

$17.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WEBNF:

$43.56B

NU:

$7.67B

EBITDA (TTM)

WEBNF:

$10.94B

NU:

$4.14B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WEBNF vs. NU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEBNF
WEBNF Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
WEBNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEBNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEBNF Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
WEBNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEBNF Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

NU
NU Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
NU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
NU Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
NU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
NU Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEBNF vs. NU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westpac Banking Corp (WEBNF) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WEBNFNUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.51

-0.02

+0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.06

0.25

+0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.03

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

-0.02

+1.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.36

-0.05

+3.41

WEBNF vs. NU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEBNF Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the NU Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEBNF and NU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WEBNFNUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

-0.02

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.06

+0.13

Drawdowns

WEBNF vs. NU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEBNF drawdown since its inception was -66.96%, smaller than the maximum NU drawdown of -72.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBNF and NU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WEBNFNUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.96%

-72.07%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.54%

-36.41%

+15.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.44%

-39.58%

+16.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.57%

-36.41%

+18.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.03%

-29.74%

+8.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.37%

13.93%

-6.56%

Volatility

WEBNF vs. NU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Westpac Banking Corp (WEBNF) is 11.84%, while Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) has a volatility of 13.41%. This indicates that WEBNF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WEBNFNUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.84%

13.41%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.54%

28.38%

+4.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.91%

38.61%

+10.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.25%

58.47%

-17.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.33%

58.47%

-19.14%

Dividends

WEBNF vs. NU - Dividend Comparison

Neither WEBNF nor NU has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WEBNF
Westpac Banking Corp
0.00%2.78%8.39%8.91%7.82%42.62%3.83%14.51%19.31%16.01%

Financials

WEBNF vs. NU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Westpac Banking Corp and Nu Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B20222023202420252026
28.03B
4.98B
(WEBNF) Total Revenue
(NU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WEBNF vs. NU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Westpac Banking Corp and Nu Holdings Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
39.3%
40.2%
Portfolio components
WEBNF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Westpac Banking Corp reported a gross profit of 11.02B and revenue of 28.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.3%.

NU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.00B and revenue of 4.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.

WEBNF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Westpac Banking Corp reported an operating income of 4.92B and revenue of 28.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

NU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 954.31M and revenue of 4.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.2%.

WEBNF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Westpac Banking Corp reported a net income of 3.42B and revenue of 28.03B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.

NU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 872.06M and revenue of 4.98B, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WEBNF and NU have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NU has higher volatility (13.41%) compared to WEBNF (11.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEBNF dropped -66.96% vs NU's -72.07%.

WEBNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WEBNF and NU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer