WEBNF vs. QQCC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Westpac Banking Corp (WEBNF) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO).
QQCC.TO is managed by Global X. It was launched on Sep 13, 2011.
Performance
WEBNF vs. QQCC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WEBNF vs. QQCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEBNF Westpac Banking Corp | 6.36% | 39.75% | 34.48% | 5.37% | 10.13% | 52.61% | -8.36% | 6.69% | -16.10% | 23.08% |
QQCC.TO Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF | -2.68% | 16.99% | 22.94% | 39.09% | -14.63% | 8.72% | -1.33% | 21.98% | -22.42% | 26.96% |
Different Trading Currencies
WEBNF is traded in USD, while QQCC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the QQCC.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEBNF achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly higher than QQCC.TO's -2.68% return. Over the past 10 years, WEBNF has outperformed QQCC.TO with an annualized return of 13.89%, while QQCC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.59% annualized return.
WEBNF
- 1D
- -6.79%
- 1M
- -10.39%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- 1Y
- 48.24%
- 3Y*
- 32.09%
- 5Y*
- 22.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.89%
QQCC.TO
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- YTD
- -2.68%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 20.90%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEBNF vs. QQCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
WEBNF
QQCC.TO
WEBNF vs. QQCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westpac Banking Corp (WEBNF) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WEBNF | QQCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 1.01 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 1.50 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.25 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 1.62 | +0.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.70 | 8.14 | -1.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WEBNF | QQCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 1.01 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.56 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.42 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | -0.00 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between WEBNF and QQCC.TO is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
WEBNF vs. QQCC.TO - Dividend Comparison
WEBNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than QQCC.TO's 12.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEBNF Westpac Banking Corp | 2.61% | 2.78% | 8.39% | 8.91% | 7.82% | 42.62% | 3.83% | 14.51% | 19.31% | 16.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQCC.TO Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF | 12.05% | 11.27% | 9.89% | 11.85% | 11.04% | 5.15% | 5.84% | 6.31% | 7.90% | 6.01% | 6.73% | 8.89% |
Drawdowns
WEBNF vs. QQCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEBNF drawdown since its inception was -66.96%, smaller than the maximum QQCC.TO drawdown of -100.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBNF and QQCC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEBNF | QQCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.96% | -100.13% | +33.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.99% | -13.73% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.26% | -22.24% | -9.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.21% | -36.70% | -24.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.50% | -100.00% | +87.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.11% | -99.78% | +78.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.09% | 3.15% | +2.94% |
Volatility
WEBNF vs. QQCC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Westpac Banking Corp (WEBNF) has a higher volatility of 11.28% compared to Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO) at 6.17%. This indicates that WEBNF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WEBNF | QQCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.28% | 6.17% | +5.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.69% | 10.90% | +20.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.65% | 20.78% | +35.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.67% | 19.52% | +23.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.13% | 20.35% | +18.78% |