PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDS vs. PXH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDS vs. PXH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDS achieves a 52.08% return, which is significantly higher than PXH's 12.73% return. Over the past 10 years, WDS has underperformed PXH with an annualized return of 7.93%, while PXH has yielded a comparatively higher 10.91% annualized return.


WDS

1D
6.17%
1M
2.76%
YTD
52.08%
6M
46.18%
1Y
58.11%
3Y*
6.16%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
7.93%

PXH

1D
0.66%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
12.73%
6M
14.41%
1Y
29.04%
3Y*
20.06%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDS vs. PXH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WDS
Woodside Energy Group Ltd
52.08%6.78%-20.60%-4.42%68.06%-6.77%-24.23%14.38%-9.70%19.32%
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
12.73%31.44%12.09%13.93%-15.18%8.31%-1.91%16.77%-8.68%26.60%

Correlation

The correlation between WDS and PXH is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between WDS and PXH has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDS vs. PXH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDS
WDS Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
WDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDS Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
WDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

PXH
PXH Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXH Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXH Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDS vs. PXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WDSPXHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

2.85

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.88

10.21

-2.33

WDS vs. PXH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDS Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the PXH Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDS and PXH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WDS vs. PXH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDS drawdown since its inception was -77.06%, which is greater than PXH's maximum drawdown of -63.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDS and PXH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDSPXHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.06%

-63.63%

-13.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.16%

-10.24%

-6.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.77%

-17.72%

-31.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.77%

-29.59%

-19.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.16%

-40.42%

-25.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.20%

-3.27%

-6.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.55%

-16.84%

-22.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.40%

2.85%

+4.55%

Volatility

WDS vs. PXH - Volatility Comparison

Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) at 6.41%. This indicates that WDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDSPXHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.13%

6.41%

+3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.23%

13.09%

+11.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.62%

15.90%

+14.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.40%

17.87%

+15.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.78%

20.06%

+13.72%

Dividends

WDS vs. PXH - Dividend Comparison

WDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, more than PXH's 3.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
3.49%4.02%4.43%4.84%5.33%4.69%2.79%3.28%3.30%2.74%1.97%3.44%
WDS
Woodside Energy Group Ltd
4.85%6.80%8.27%10.62%8.84%2.39%4.41%5.12%5.45%3.65%5.21%9.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


WDS and PXH have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WDS has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to PXH (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDS dropped -77.06% vs PXH's -63.63%.

WDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDS and PXH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer