PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXH vs. FNDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXH vs. FNDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXH achieves a 14.20% return, which is significantly lower than FNDE's 15.01% return. Over the past 10 years, PXH has underperformed FNDE with an annualized return of 9.64%, while FNDE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.16% annualized return.


PXH

1D
0.97%
1M
4.81%
6M
6.84%
YTD
14.20%
1Y
29.44%
3Y*
19.40%
5Y*
10.44%
10Y*
9.64%
ALL TIME*
3.67%

FNDE

1D
0.66%
1M
4.72%
6M
6.81%
YTD
15.01%
1Y
29.41%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
10.74%
10Y*
10.16%
ALL TIME*
7.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$29.51M$30.86M$33.63M
$5.58M$7.03M$7.21M

PXH vs. FNDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
14.20%31.44%12.09%13.93%-15.18%8.31%-1.91%16.77%-8.68%26.60%
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
15.01%29.46%12.10%14.99%-15.58%14.41%-2.77%19.75%-10.37%26.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PXH and FNDE is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.97

The correlation between PXH and FNDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

PXH vs. FNDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXH
FNDE

Financial Services

26.1%
25.0%

Technology

24.3%
22.3%

Basic Materials

10.9%
12.0%

Energy

10.8%
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
8.9%

Communication Services

6.2%
6.6%

Industrials

4.6%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
3.3%

Utilities

2.2%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.4%

Healthcare

0.9%
0.4%

Financial Services

PXH
26.1%
FNDE
25.0%

Technology

PXH
24.3%
FNDE
22.3%

Basic Materials

PXH
10.9%
FNDE
12.0%

Energy

PXH
10.8%
FNDE
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PXH
9.7%
FNDE
8.9%

Communication Services

PXH
6.2%
FNDE
6.6%

Industrials

PXH
4.6%
FNDE
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

PXH
2.9%
FNDE
3.3%

Utilities

PXH
2.2%
FNDE
2.4%

Real Estate

PXH
1.5%
FNDE
1.4%

Healthcare

PXH
0.9%
FNDE
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXH vs. FNDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PXH
PXH Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXH Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
PXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXH Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDE
FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PXH vs. FNDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXHFNDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

2.82

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.74

8.93

-0.19

PXH vs. FNDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXH Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the FNDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXH and FNDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXH vs. FNDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXH drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than FNDE's maximum drawdown of -43.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXH and FNDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXHFNDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.63%

-43.55%

-20.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.24%

-10.23%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.72%

-18.40%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.59%

-29.44%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.42%

-39.93%

-0.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-2.07%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.76%

-11.62%

-5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

3.22%

+0.06%

Volatility

PXH vs. FNDE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) have volatilities of 4.46% and 4.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXHFNDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

4.42%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.66%

13.64%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.46%

16.16%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.94%

17.08%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.86%

19.13%

+0.73%

PXH vs. FNDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDE's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXH vs. FNDE - Dividend Comparison

PXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than FNDE's 3.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.60%4.19%4.82%4.74%5.59%4.32%2.50%3.47%2.98%2.05%1.65%2.02%
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
4.21%4.02%4.43%4.84%5.33%4.69%2.79%3.28%3.30%2.74%1.97%3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, PXH and FNDE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PXH has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to FNDE (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXH dropped -63.63% vs FNDE's -43.55%.

On 10-year performance, FNDE leads with 10.16% vs 9.64% for PXH. On fees, FNDE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDE has performed better with a 10.16% return vs 9.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PXH.

PXH has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 3.60% for FNDE.

PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while FNDE tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PXH and 0.39% for FNDE.

FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXH and FNDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer