WDS vs. TSLA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA).

Performance

WDS vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WDS vs. TSLA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd	56.10%	6.78%	-20.60%	-4.42%	68.06%	-6.77%	-24.23%	14.38%	-9.70%	19.32%
TSLA Tesla, Inc.	-15.22%	11.36%	62.52%	101.72%	-65.03%	49.76%	743.44%	25.70%	6.89%	45.70%

Fundamentals

Market Cap WDS : $45.34B TSLA : $1.35T
EPS WDS : $3.29 TSLA : $1.08
PE Ratio WDS : 7.20 TSLA : 354.53
PEG Ratio WDS : 0.24 TSLA : 43.37
PS Ratio WDS : 1.73 TSLA : 14.18
PB Ratio WDS : 1.26 TSLA : 16.43
Total Revenue (TTM) WDS : $26.15B TSLA : $94.83B
Gross Profit (TTM) WDS : $9.87B TSLA : $17.09B
EBITDA (TTM) WDS : $17.06B TSLA : $11.76B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDS achieves a 56.10% return, which is significantly higher than TSLA's -15.22% return. Over the past 10 years, WDS has underperformed TSLA with an annualized return of 7.98%, while TSLA has yielded a comparatively higher 37.45% annualized return.

WDS

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: 13.67%
• YTD: 56.10%
• 6M: 60.53%
• 1Y: 70.10%
• 3Y*: 8.74%
• 5Y*: 13.32%
• 10Y*: 7.98%

TSLA

• 1D: 2.56%
• 1M: -5.47%
• YTD: -15.22%
• 6M: -17.02%
• 1Y: 42.02%
• 3Y*: 22.49%
• 5Y*: 11.57%
• 10Y*: 37.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

WDS vs. TSLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDS

WDS Risk / Return Rank: 88
WDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
WDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
WDS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
WDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
WDS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

TSLA

TSLA Risk / Return Rank: 68
TSLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
TSLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TSLA Omega Ratio Rank: 62
TSLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
TSLA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDS vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WDS	TSLA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	0.76	+1.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	1.41	+1.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.17	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	1.71	+1.61
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.23	4.17	+5.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WDS vs. TSLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDS Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the TSLA Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDS and TSLA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WDS	TSLA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.07	0.76	+1.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.20	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	0.64	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.72	-0.67

Correlation

The correlation between WDS and TSLA is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

WDS vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison

WDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, while TSLA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd	4.73%	6.80%	8.27%	10.62%	8.84%	2.39%	4.41%	5.12%	5.45%	3.65%	5.21%	9.84%
TSLA Tesla, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

WDS vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDS drawdown since its inception was -77.06%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLA drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDS and TSLA.

Drawdown Indicators

	WDS	TSLA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.06%	-73.63%	-3.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.91%	-27.48%	+6.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.77%	-73.63%	+24.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.16%	-73.63%	+7.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.83%	-22.17%	+14.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.86%	-22.77%	-17.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.92%	11.30%	-3.38%

Volatility

WDS vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison

Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) has a higher volatility of 12.04% compared to Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) at 11.32%. This indicates that WDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WDS	TSLA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.04%	11.32%	+0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.64%	29.84%	-8.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.06%	55.50%	-21.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.07%	59.08%	-26.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.79%	59.02%	-25.23%

Financials

WDS vs. TSLA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Woodside Energy Group Ltd and Tesla, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WDS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a gross profit of 1.99B and revenue of 6.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.1%.

TSLA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.01B and revenue of 24.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.1%.

WDS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported an operating income of 1.67B and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.1%.

TSLA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.41B and revenue of 24.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.7%.

WDS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a net income of 1.40B and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.

TSLA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a net income of 840.00M and revenue of 24.90B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.