PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXH vs. PXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXH vs. PXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXH achieves a 16.54% return, which is significantly lower than PXF's 21.27% return. Over the past 10 years, PXH has underperformed PXF with an annualized return of 10.99%, while PXF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.88% annualized return.


PXH

1D
1.80%
1M
4.79%
YTD
16.54%
6M
17.48%
1Y
39.55%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
10.99%

PXF

1D
0.62%
1M
6.53%
YTD
21.27%
6M
25.96%
1Y
44.09%
3Y*
25.42%
5Y*
13.78%
10Y*
11.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXH vs. PXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
16.54%31.44%12.09%13.93%-15.18%8.31%-1.91%16.77%-8.68%26.60%
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
21.27%42.51%4.54%18.46%-9.09%15.93%2.58%17.50%-14.84%24.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PXH and PXF is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2007

0.77

The correlation between PXH and PXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

PXH vs. PXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXH
PXF

Financial Services

25.8%
19.7%

Technology

19.9%
11.4%

Energy

13.0%
10.6%

Basic Materials

12.1%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
10.2%

Communication Services

6.2%
4.3%

Industrials

4.6%
15.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
6.1%

Utilities

2.4%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.8%

Healthcare

0.9%
7.2%

Financial Services

PXH
25.8%
PXF
19.7%

Technology

PXH
19.9%
PXF
11.4%

Energy

PXH
13.0%
PXF
10.6%

Basic Materials

PXH
12.1%
PXF
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PXH
10.7%
PXF
10.2%

Communication Services

PXH
6.2%
PXF
4.3%

Industrials

PXH
4.6%
PXF
15.1%

Consumer Defensive

PXH
2.8%
PXF
6.1%

Utilities

PXH
2.4%
PXF
3.6%

Real Estate

PXH
1.7%
PXF
1.8%

Healthcare

PXH
0.9%
PXF
7.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXH vs. PXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXH
PXH Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXH Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXH Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

PXF
PXF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXF Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXH vs. PXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXHPXFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.61

2.91

-0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.47

3.82

-0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.52

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

4.18

-0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.79

16.08

-1.29

PXH vs. PXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXH Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the PXF Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXH and PXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXHPXFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.91

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.84

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.66

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.24

-0.09

Drawdowns

PXH vs. PXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXH drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, roughly equal to the maximum PXF drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXH and PXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXHPXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.63%

-64.74%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.24%

-10.91%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.72%

-14.06%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.59%

-26.82%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.42%

-41.59%

+1.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.87%

-15.28%

-1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

2.84%

-0.09%

Volatility

PXH vs. PXF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) is 5.12%, while Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that PXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXHPXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

5.41%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.17%

12.84%

-0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.22%

15.24%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.77%

16.45%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.07%

18.04%

+2.03%

PXH vs. PXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PXF's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXH vs. PXF - Dividend Comparison

PXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than PXF's 3.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
3.05%3.64%3.48%3.55%3.58%3.74%2.11%3.50%3.38%2.78%3.21%3.10%
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
3.38%4.02%4.43%4.84%5.33%4.69%2.79%3.28%3.30%2.74%1.97%3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXH and PXF have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXF has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to PXH (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXH dropped -63.63% vs PXF's -64.74%.

On 10-year performance, PXF leads with 11.88% vs 10.99% for PXH. On fees, PXF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PXH has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PXF has performed better with a 11.88% return vs 10.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PXF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PXH.

PXH has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 3.05% for PXF.

PXH is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PXF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PXH and 0.45% for PXF.

PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXH and PXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer