WDS vs. COST
WDS (Woodside Energy Group Ltd) and COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) are both stocks. WDS operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while COST operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, WDS returned 7.93%/yr vs 22.27%/yr for COST. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WDS vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDS achieves a 52.08% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 14.24% return. Over the past 10 years, WDS has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 7.93%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.27% annualized return.
WDS
- 1D
- 6.17%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 52.08%
- 6M
- 46.18%
- 1Y
- 58.11%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
COST
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 11.38%
- 1Y
- -1.48%
- 3Y*
- 25.12%
- 5Y*
- 22.12%
- 10Y*
- 22.27%
WDS vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd | 52.08% | 6.78% | -20.60% | -4.42% | 68.06% | -6.77% | -24.23% | 14.38% | -9.70% | 19.32% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 14.24% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 45.70% | 10.60% | 22.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDS and COST is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007 | 0.23 |
The correlation between WDS and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WDS:
$3.29
COST:
$26.51
WDS:
7.02
COST:
37.06
WDS:
0.24
COST:
2.90
WDS:
1.69
COST:
1.12
WDS:
$26.15B
COST:
$293.59B
WDS:
$9.87B
COST:
$11.12B
WDS:
$17.06B
COST:
$12.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDS vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank
WDS
COST
WDS vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDS | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.00 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | -0.10 | +3.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.88 | -0.22 | +8.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDS vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDS drawdown since its inception was -77.06%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDS and COST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDS | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.06% | -53.39% | -23.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.16% | -15.14% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.77% | -20.74% | -28.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.77% | -31.40% | -17.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.16% | -31.40% | -34.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.20% | -10.23% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.55% | -13.36% | -26.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.40% | 6.67% | +0.73% |
Volatility
WDS vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 7.44%. This indicates that WDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDS | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 7.44% | +2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.23% | 14.53% | +9.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.62% | 18.80% | +11.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.40% | 22.72% | +10.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 21.95% | +11.83% |
Dividends
WDS vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
WDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, more than COST's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd | 4.85% | 6.80% | 8.27% | 10.62% | 8.84% | 2.39% | 4.41% | 5.12% | 5.45% | 3.65% | 5.21% | 9.84% |
Financials
WDS vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Woodside Energy Group Ltd and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WDS vs. COST - Profitability Comparison
WDS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a gross profit of 1.99B and revenue of 6.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.1%.
COST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.
WDS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported an operating income of 1.67B and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.1%.
COST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.
WDS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a net income of 1.40B and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.
COST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WDS and COST have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WDS has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to COST (7.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDS dropped -77.06% vs COST's -53.39%.
WDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WDS and COST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer