WARP vs. VTI
WARP (VanEck Space ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WARP is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Space Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WARP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
WARP vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WARP
- 1D
- -6.61%
- 1M
- -29.11%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTI
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 27.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 15.31%
WARP vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WARP VanEck Space ETF | -7.76% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between WARP and VTI is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WARP vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
WARP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VTI
WARP vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WARP | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.06 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WARP vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WARP drawdown since its inception was -37.43%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WARP and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WARP | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.43% | -55.45% | +18.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.43% | -1.48% | -35.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.70% | -8.01% | -4.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.99% | — |
Volatility
WARP vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WARP | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 90.52% | 12.76% | +77.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.52% | 17.49% | +73.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.52% | 18.35% | +72.17% |
WARP vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
WARP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
WARP vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
WARP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
WARP VanEck Space ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WARP and VTI have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WARP.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for WARP.
WARP is categorized as Industrials Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. WARP tracks MarketVector Space Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WARP and 0.03% for VTI.
Find the right allocation for WARP and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer