WARP vs. IFRA
WARP (VanEck Space ETF) and IFRA (iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - WARP tracks the MarketVector Space Index while IFRA tracks the NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WARP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IFRA.
Performance
WARP vs. IFRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WARP
- 1D
- -6.84%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFRA
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 28.44%
- 3Y*
- 20.10%
- 5Y*
- 13.03%
- 10Y*
- —
WARP vs. IFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WARP VanEck Space ETF | 23.47% |
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | -0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between WARP and IFRA is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2026 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WARP vs. IFRA — Risk / Return Rank
WARP
IFRA
WARP vs. IFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WARP | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 22.26 | 0.63 | +21.63 |
Drawdowns
WARP vs. IFRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WARP drawdown since its inception was -18.67%, smaller than the maximum IFRA drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WARP and IFRA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WARP | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.67% | -41.06% | +22.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.67% | -2.66% | -16.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -5.14% | +1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.25% | — |
Volatility
WARP vs. IFRA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WARP | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.83% | 14.79% | +69.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.83% | 17.92% | +65.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.83% | 21.38% | +62.45% |
WARP vs. IFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
WARP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IFRA's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
WARP vs. IFRA - Dividend Comparison
WARP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 1.59% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 1.68% | 2.50% |
WARP VanEck Space ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WARP and IFRA have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IFRA is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IFRA is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WARP.
IFRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.00% for WARP.
WARP tracks MarketVector Space Index, while IFRA tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WARP and 0.30% for IFRA.
Find the right allocation for WARP and IFRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer