IFRA vs. FNDA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA).
IFRA and FNDA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IFRA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2018. FNDA is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI Small Company US. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both IFRA and FNDA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IFRA or FNDA.
Key characteristics
| IFRA | FNDA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.27% | -2.67% |
| 1Y Return | 16.04% | 14.41% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.82% | 2.56% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.98% | 8.58% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.02 | 0.75 |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.89% | 18.88% |
| Max Drawdown | -41.06% | -44.64% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.61% | -5.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFRA and FNDA is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IFRA vs. FNDA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IFRA achieves a 5.27% return, which is significantly higher than FNDA's -2.67% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IFRA vs. FNDA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFRA has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDA's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IFRA vs. FNDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IFRA vs. FNDA - Dividend Comparison
IFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than FNDA's 1.44% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 1.85% | 1.98% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 1.68% | 2.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 1.44% | 1.37% | 1.38% | 1.15% | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.67% | 1.30% | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.06% | 0.32% |
Drawdowns
IFRA vs. FNDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFRA drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, smaller than the maximum FNDA drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFRA and FNDA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IFRA vs. FNDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) is 3.92%, while Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that IFRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.