IFRA vs. IGF
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF).
IFRA and IGF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IFRA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2018. IGF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Dec 10, 2007. Both IFRA and IGF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IFRA or IGF.
Performance
IFRA vs. IGF - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFRA achieves a 27.99% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 19.62% return.
IFRA
27.99%
7.23%
17.45%
38.77%
15.36%
N/A
IGF
19.62%
1.37%
13.42%
26.13%
6.33%
5.60%
Key characteristics
| IFRA | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.48 | 2.25 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.48 | 3.07 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.43 | 1.39 |
| Calmar Ratio | 5.49 | 2.64 |
| Martin Ratio | 13.44 | 11.91 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.95% | 2.22% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.95% | 11.76% |
| Max Drawdown | -41.06% | -58.33% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IFRA vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFRA has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IGF's 0.46% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between IFRA and IGF is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IFRA vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IFRA vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison
IFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than IGF's 3.14% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 1.60% | 1.98% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.07% | 1.68% | 2.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.14% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.99% | 3.24% | 3.00% | 3.45% |
Drawdowns
IFRA vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFRA drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFRA and IGF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IFRA vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.98%. This indicates that IFRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.