PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VZ vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VZ vs. NOBL

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VZ (Verizon Communications Inc.) is a stock, while NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Over the past 10 years, VZ returned 4.44%/yr vs 9.94%/yr for NOBL. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VZ vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VZ achieves a 21.97% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 7.43% return. Over the past 10 years, VZ has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 4.44%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.94% annualized return.

VZ

1D
2.49%
1M
2.23%
YTD
21.97%
6M
21.50%
1Y
19.39%
3Y*
18.39%
5Y*
2.74%
10Y*
4.44%

NOBL

1D
0.54%
1M
4.72%
YTD
7.43%
6M
6.43%
1Y
13.97%
3Y*
8.55%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*
9.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VZ vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.		21.97%8.86%13.14%2.71%-20.02%-7.55%-0.13%13.83%11.26%3.97%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF		7.43%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between VZ and NOBL is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013

0.47

The correlation between VZ and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Verizon Communications Inc.

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

Often compared with VZ:
VZ vs. TVZ vs. TMUSVZ vs. KOVZ vs. SPYVZ vs. SCHDVZ vs. VOOVZ vs. PEP
Often compared with NOBL:
NOBL vs. SCHDNOBL vs. SPYNOBL vs. VIGNOBL vs. DGRONOBL vs. SDYNOBL vs. VOONOBL vs. KNG

Return for Risk

VZ vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VZ
VZ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VZ vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

VZNOBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.84
1.09

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.49
1.67

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.19

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

1.38

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.06

3.53

-0.48

VZ vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VZ and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VZ vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VZ drawdown since its inception was -50.66%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VZ and NOBL.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VZNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.66%

-35.43%

-15.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-9.11%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.93%

-15.36%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.38%

-17.92%

-20.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.21%

-35.43%

-5.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.96%

-2.43%

-2.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.82%

-3.48%

-11.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.23%

3.56%

+2.67%

Volatility

VZ vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.95%. This indicates that VZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VZNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.87%

2.95%

+3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.91%

8.11%

+9.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.78%

11.52%

+11.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

14.41%

+7.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.36%

16.61%

+3.75%

Dividends

VZ vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

VZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than NOBL's 2.04% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF		2.04%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.		5.75%6.68%6.68%6.96%6.53%4.85%4.21%3.95%4.22%4.39%4.26%4.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

VZ and NOBL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VZ has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to NOBL (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VZ dropped -50.66% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VZ and NOBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer