PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VYM vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VYM vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VYM achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return. Over the past 10 years, VYM has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 11.90%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.78% annualized return.


VYM

1D
-0.43%
1M
3.38%
YTD
12.47%
6M
12.01%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
11.90%

VGT

1D
-1.48%
1M
18.07%
YTD
31.64%
6M
30.51%
1Y
60.15%
3Y*
33.48%
5Y*
22.23%
10Y*
25.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VYM vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
12.47%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
31.64%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VYM and VGT is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between VYM and VGT has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VYM vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VYM
VGT

Financial Services

20.5%
0.5%

Technology

17.7%
98.5%

Healthcare

12.2%
0.0%

Industrials

12.1%
0.4%

Energy

9.8%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
0.1%

Utilities

5.7%

-

Communication Services

3.5%
0.5%

Basic Materials

3.5%
0.0%

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Financial Services

VYM
20.5%
VGT
0.5%

Technology

VYM
17.7%
VGT
98.5%

Healthcare

VYM
12.2%
VGT
0.0%

Industrials

VYM
12.1%
VGT
0.4%

Energy

VYM
9.8%
VGT
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

VYM
8.1%
VGT

-

Consumer Cyclical

VYM
6.7%
VGT
0.1%

Utilities

VYM
5.7%
VGT

-

Communication Services

VYM
3.5%
VGT
0.5%

Basic Materials

VYM
3.5%
VGT
0.0%

Real Estate

VYM
0.0%
VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VYM vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VYM vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VYMVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.47

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

3.69

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.76

11.77

+2.99

VYM vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VYM and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VYMVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

2.95

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.89

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

1.05

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.68

-0.17

Drawdowns

VYM vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VYM drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, roughly equal to the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYM and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VYMVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.98%

-54.63%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-16.40%

+9.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-27.23%

+12.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.84%

-35.07%

+19.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-35.07%

-0.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-1.48%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.19%

-7.95%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

5.13%

-3.35%

Volatility

VYM vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is 2.77%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that VYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VYMVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

6.39%

-3.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.67%

16.07%

-8.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.28%

20.57%

-10.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.96%

25.18%

-11.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.34%

24.60%

-8.26%

VYM vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VYM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VYM vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.19%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VYM and VGT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to VYM (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYM dropped -56.98% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.78% vs 11.90% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.78% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.31% for VGT.

VYM is categorized as Dividend, while VGT is Technology Equities. VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VYM and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VYM and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer