VYM vs. PHO
VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) and PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while PHO is a Water Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VYM returned 11.95%/yr vs 11.71%/yr for PHO. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VYM charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PHO.
Performance
VYM vs. PHO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VYM achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly higher than PHO's -4.97% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VYM having a 11.95% annualized return and PHO not far behind at 11.71%.
VYM
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 24.69%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
PHO
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- -4.97%
- 6M
- -6.44%
- 1Y
- -3.21%
- 3Y*
- 7.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
VYM vs. PHO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.37% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | -4.97% | 7.62% | 8.59% | 18.85% | -14.86% | 31.28% | 20.83% | 37.57% | -6.40% | 23.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between VYM and PHO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2006 | 0.81 |
The correlation between VYM and PHO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
VYM vs. PHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VYM
PHO
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
VYM
PHO
Technology
VYM
PHO
Healthcare
VYM
PHO
Industrials
VYM
PHO
Energy
VYM
PHO
-
Consumer Defensive
VYM
PHO
-
Consumer Cyclical
VYM
PHO
-
Utilities
VYM
PHO
Communication Services
VYM
PHO
-
Basic Materials
VYM
PHO
Real Estate
VYM
PHO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VYM vs. PHO — Risk / Return Rank
VYM
PHO
VYM vs. PHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VYM | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.98 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | -0.23 | +3.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.81 | -0.58 | +14.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VYM vs. PHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VYM drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, roughly equal to the maximum PHO drawdown of -55.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYM and PHO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VYM | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.98% | -55.62% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.69% | -13.78% | +7.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.46% | -19.19% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.84% | -28.60% | +12.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.21% | -34.92% | -0.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -10.21% | +9.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -10.18% | +3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 5.59% | -3.79% |
Volatility
VYM vs. PHO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is 3.31%, while Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) has a volatility of 4.41%. This indicates that VYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VYM | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 4.41% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.81% | 11.15% | -3.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.47% | 15.12% | -4.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 18.40% | -4.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 19.46% | -3.11% |
VYM vs. PHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VYM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PHO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VYM vs. PHO - Dividend Comparison
VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than PHO's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | 0.58% | 0.54% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.47% | 0.75% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.19% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VYM and PHO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHO has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to VYM (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYM dropped -56.98% vs PHO's -55.62%.
On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.95% vs 11.71% for PHO. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.95% return vs 11.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PHO.
VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.58% for PHO.
VYM is categorized as Dividend, while PHO is Water Equities. VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while PHO tracks NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VYM and 0.60% for PHO.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VYM and PHO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer