PHO vs. EVX
PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) and EVX (VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PHO is a Water Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, while EVX is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the NYSE Arca Environmental Services Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PHO returned 11.51%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for EVX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PHO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for EVX.
Performance
PHO vs. EVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHO achieves a -5.69% return, which is significantly lower than EVX's 1.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PHO having a 11.51% annualized return and EVX not far ahead at 11.86%.
PHO
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- -5.69%
- 6M
- -7.76%
- 1Y
- -1.24%
- 3Y*
- 7.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.26%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
EVX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- 9.85%
- 5Y*
- 6.96%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
PHO vs. EVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | -5.69% | 7.62% | 8.59% | 18.85% | -14.86% | 31.28% | 20.83% | 37.57% | -6.40% | 23.55% |
EVX VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF | 1.43% | 11.72% | 12.99% | 12.97% | -10.58% | 27.47% | 13.28% | 28.41% | -3.82% | 16.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHO and EVX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2006 | 0.71 |
The correlation between PHO and EVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PHO vs. EVX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PHO
EVX
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
-
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
PHO
EVX
Utilities
PHO
EVX
Technology
PHO
EVX
-
Basic Materials
PHO
EVX
Healthcare
PHO
EVX
-
Financial Services
PHO
EVX
-
Communication Services
PHO
-
EVX
-
Consumer Cyclical
PHO
-
EVX
-
Consumer Defensive
PHO
-
EVX
Energy
PHO
-
EVX
Real Estate
PHO
-
EVX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHO vs. EVX — Risk / Return Rank
PHO
EVX
PHO vs. EVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) and VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHO | EVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | 0.31 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | 0.52 | -0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.06 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 0.33 | -0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 0.80 | -1.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHO | EVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 0.31 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.40 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.59 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.43 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
PHO vs. EVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHO drawdown since its inception was -55.62%, roughly equal to the maximum EVX drawdown of -55.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHO and EVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHO | EVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.62% | -55.91% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.78% | -10.85% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.19% | -19.33% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.60% | -21.45% | -7.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.92% | -41.01% | +6.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.89% | -8.37% | -2.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.18% | -8.76% | -1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.27% | 4.54% | +0.73% |
Volatility
PHO vs. EVX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX) at 3.32%. This indicates that PHO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHO | EVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 3.32% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.92% | 9.83% | +1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.05% | 13.51% | +1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 17.59% | +0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 20.25% | -0.79% |
PHO vs. EVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EVX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHO vs. EVX - Dividend Comparison
PHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, more than EVX's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVX VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF | 0.18% | 0.19% | 0.46% | 0.95% | 0.41% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.38% | 0.89% | 0.70% | 1.16% |
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | 0.58% | 0.54% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.47% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHO and EVX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHO has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to EVX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHO dropped -55.62% vs EVX's -55.91%.
On 10-year performance, EVX leads with 11.86% vs 11.51% for PHO. On fees, EVX is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, EVX has been the lower-risk option at 3.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EVX has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 11.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EVX is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PHO.
PHO has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.18% for EVX.
PHO is categorized as Water Equities, while EVX is Industrials Equities. PHO tracks NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, while EVX tracks NYSE Arca Environmental Services Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PHO and 0.55% for EVX.
EVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.31 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHO and EVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer