PHO vs. SPY
PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PHO is a Water Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PHO returned 11.81%/yr vs 15.07%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PHO charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
PHO vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, PHO has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 11.81%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.07% annualized return.
PHO
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- 6M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.79%
- 3Y*
- 7.24%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.29%
SPY
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 1Y
- 21.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.69M | $5.70M | $8.61M | |
| $37.27B | $35.99B | $39.23B |
PHO vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | 0.00% | 7.62% | 8.59% | 18.85% | -14.86% | 31.28% | 20.83% | 37.57% | -6.40% | 23.55% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.13% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHO and SPY is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2005 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PHO and SPY has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PHO vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PHO
SPY
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Basic Materials
Utilities
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
PHO
SPY
Healthcare
PHO
SPY
Technology
PHO
SPY
Basic Materials
PHO
SPY
Utilities
PHO
SPY
Financial Services
PHO
SPY
Communication Services
PHO
-
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
PHO
-
SPY
Consumer Defensive
PHO
-
SPY
Energy
PHO
-
SPY
Real Estate
PHO
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHO vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
PHO
SPY
PHO vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHO | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.27 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 2.20 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.03 | 9.40 | -9.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHO vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHO drawdown since its inception was -55.62%, roughly equal to the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHO and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHO | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.62% | -55.19% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.78% | -8.88% | -4.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.19% | -18.76% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.60% | -24.50% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.92% | -33.72% | -1.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.52% | -1.40% | -4.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.17% | -9.01% | -1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.24% | 2.08% | +4.16% |
Volatility
PHO vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.58%. This indicates that PHO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHO | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.89% | 3.58% | +2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 10.14% | +1.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.07% | 12.89% | +3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 17.18% | +1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 17.95% | +1.55% |
PHO vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHO vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
PHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | 0.58% | 0.54% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.47% | 0.75% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHO and SPY have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHO has higher volatility (5.89%) compared to SPY (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHO dropped -55.62% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.07% vs 11.81% for PHO. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.07% return vs 11.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PHO.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.58% for PHO.
PHO is categorized as Water Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. PHO tracks NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PHO and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHO and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer