PHO vs. SPY
PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PHO is a Water Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PHO returned 11.81%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PHO charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
PHO vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHO achieves a -4.80% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, PHO has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 11.81%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.
PHO
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- -4.80%
- 6M
- -6.74%
- 1Y
- -1.51%
- 3Y*
- 7.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.81%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
PHO vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | -4.80% | 7.62% | 8.59% | 18.85% | -14.86% | 31.28% | 20.83% | 37.57% | -6.40% | 23.55% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.74% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHO and SPY is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2005 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PHO and SPY has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PHO vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PHO
SPY
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
PHO
SPY
Utilities
PHO
SPY
Technology
PHO
SPY
Healthcare
PHO
SPY
Basic Materials
PHO
SPY
Financial Services
PHO
SPY
Communication Services
PHO
-
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
PHO
-
SPY
Consumer Defensive
PHO
-
SPY
Energy
PHO
-
SPY
Real Estate
PHO
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHO vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
PHO
SPY
PHO vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHO | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.39 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 3.01 | -3.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.26 | 13.54 | -13.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHO vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHO drawdown since its inception was -55.62%, roughly equal to the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHO and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHO | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.62% | -55.19% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.78% | -8.88% | -4.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.19% | -18.76% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.60% | -24.50% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.92% | -33.72% | -1.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.06% | -1.75% | -8.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.18% | -9.04% | -1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.76% | 1.97% | +3.79% |
Volatility
PHO vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) is 4.38%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that PHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHO | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.38% | 4.64% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.31% | 9.75% | +1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.20% | 12.43% | +2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 17.14% | +1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.47% | 17.99% | +1.48% |
PHO vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHO vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
PHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | 0.76% | 0.54% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.47% | 0.75% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHO and SPY have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to PHO (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHO dropped -55.62% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.70% vs 11.81% for PHO. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, PHO has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 11.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PHO.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.76% for PHO.
PHO is categorized as Water Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. PHO tracks NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PHO and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHO and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer