PHO vs. VOO
PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PHO is a Water Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PHO returned 11.78%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PHO charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
PHO vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHO achieves a -5.09% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, PHO has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 11.78%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.
PHO
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- -5.09%
- 6M
- -6.73%
- 1Y
- -3.23%
- 3Y*
- 7.30%
- 5Y*
- 5.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
VOO
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
PHO vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | -5.09% | 7.62% | 8.59% | 18.85% | -14.86% | 31.28% | 20.83% | 37.57% | -6.40% | 23.55% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.19% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHO and VOO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PHO and VOO has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PHO vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PHO
VOO
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
PHO
VOO
Utilities
PHO
VOO
Technology
PHO
VOO
Healthcare
PHO
VOO
Basic Materials
PHO
VOO
Financial Services
PHO
VOO
Communication Services
PHO
-
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
PHO
-
VOO
Consumer Defensive
PHO
-
VOO
Energy
PHO
-
VOO
Real Estate
PHO
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHO vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
PHO
VOO
PHO vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHO | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.35 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 2.67 | -2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.56 | 11.96 | -12.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHO vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHO drawdown since its inception was -55.62%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHO and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHO | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.62% | -33.99% | -21.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.78% | -8.90% | -4.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.19% | -18.69% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.60% | -24.52% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.92% | -33.99% | -0.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.33% | -3.14% | -7.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.18% | -3.68% | -6.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.79% | 1.99% | +3.80% |
Volatility
PHO vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) is 4.40%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that PHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHO | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 4.83% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.31% | 9.82% | +1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.17% | 12.46% | +2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 16.91% | +1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.45% | 18.02% | +1.43% |
PHO vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHO vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
PHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than VOO's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | 0.61% | 0.54% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.47% | 0.75% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHO and VOO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOO has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to PHO (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHO dropped -55.62% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.61% vs 11.78% for PHO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, PHO has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.61% return vs 11.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PHO.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.61% for PHO.
PHO is categorized as Water Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. PHO tracks NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PHO and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHO and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer