VWO vs. CIBR

Last updated Jun 12, 2026

VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VWO returned 8.88%/yr vs 17.87%/yr for CIBR. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VWO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.

Performance

VWO vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 19.83% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 8.88%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 17.87% annualized return.

VWO

• 1D: 2.39%
• 1M: -0.49%
• YTD: 9.93%
• 6M: 10.69%
• 1Y: 23.70%
• 3Y*: 16.63%
• 5Y*: 4.87%
• 10Y*: 8.88%

CIBR

• 1D: 2.67%
• 1M: 14.20%
• YTD: 19.83%
• 6M: 13.32%
• 1Y: 18.11%
• 3Y*: 24.84%
• 5Y*: 13.62%
• 10Y*: 17.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWO vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF	9.93%	25.60%	10.59%	9.25%	-17.98%	1.26%	15.17%	20.75%	-14.76%	31.49%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	19.83%	13.06%	18.21%	39.71%	-26.46%	19.67%	50.53%	28.52%	1.47%	18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and CIBR is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015	0.53

The correlation between VWO and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VWO vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VWO	CIBR
Technology	29.6%	94.0%
Financial Services	19.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	-
Industrials	8.0%	3.5%
Basic Materials	8.0%	-
Communication Services	7.1%	2.6%
Energy	4.6%	-
Healthcare	3.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	-
Utilities	2.9%	-
Real Estate	2.2%	-

Return for Risk

VWO vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWO

VWO Risk / Return Rank: 52
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 52
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 53

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 23
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 25
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWO vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VWO	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	0.72	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	1.14	+0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.14	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	0.83	+1.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.51	1.94	+5.57

VWO vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VWO vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	VWO	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.68%	-33.89%	-33.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.17%	-21.99%	+10.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.37%	-21.99%	+4.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.60%	-33.89%	+1.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.39%	-33.89%	-2.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.42%	-9.38%	+5.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.81%	-8.66%	-7.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	9.36%	-6.20%

Volatility

VWO vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) is 6.66%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 12.35%. This indicates that VWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VWO	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.66%	12.35%	-5.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.04%	21.72%	-7.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.53%	25.16%	-8.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.48%	25.05%	-7.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.23%	23.65%	-4.42%

VWO vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

VWO vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than CIBR's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.48%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF	2.45%	2.79%	3.20%	3.52%	4.11%	2.63%	1.91%	3.23%	2.88%	2.30%	2.52%	3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VWO and CIBR in my portfolio?

VWO and CIBR have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VWO or CIBR?

CIBR has higher volatility (12.35%) compared to VWO (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, VWO or CIBR?

On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 17.87% vs 8.88% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VWO or CIBR?

Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 17.87% return vs 8.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VWO or CIBR?

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VWO or CIBR?

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.48% for CIBR.

What is the main difference between VWO and CIBR?

VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.60% for CIBR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.