VWO vs. IEMG
VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index, while IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VWO returned 8.88%/yr vs 10.32%/yr for IEMG. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VWO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.
Performance
VWO vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 22.09% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 8.88%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.32% annualized return.
VWO
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 23.70%
- 3Y*
- 16.63%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.88%
IEMG
- 1D
- 4.39%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 22.09%
- 6M
- 23.42%
- 1Y
- 41.78%
- 3Y*
- 21.45%
- 5Y*
- 7.02%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
VWO vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 9.93% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 22.09% | 32.56% | 6.50% | 11.52% | -19.98% | -0.64% | 17.87% | 17.81% | -14.92% | 37.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWO and IEMG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012 | 0.98 |
The correlation between VWO and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
VWO vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWO
IEMG
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VWO
IEMG
Financial Services
VWO
IEMG
Consumer Cyclical
VWO
IEMG
Industrials
VWO
IEMG
Basic Materials
VWO
IEMG
Communication Services
VWO
IEMG
Energy
VWO
IEMG
Healthcare
VWO
IEMG
Consumer Defensive
VWO
IEMG
Utilities
VWO
IEMG
Real Estate
VWO
IEMG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWO vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank
VWO
IEMG
VWO vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VWO | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.38 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 3.18 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.51 | 11.70 | -4.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VWO vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and IEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWO | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.68% | -38.71% | -28.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -13.21% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.37% | -17.21% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.60% | -35.75% | +3.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | -38.71% | +2.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -4.56% | +1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.81% | -12.96% | -2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 3.58% | -0.42% |
Volatility
VWO vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) is 6.66%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 10.76%. This indicates that VWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWO | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 10.76% | -4.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 18.90% | -4.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.53% | 21.08% | -4.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 18.73% | -1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 20.17% | -0.94% |
VWO vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VWO vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison
VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than IEMG's 2.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.25% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.45% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, VWO and IEMG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IEMG has higher volatility (10.76%) compared to VWO (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs IEMG's -38.71%.
On 10-year performance, IEMG leads with 10.32% vs 8.88% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 10.32% return vs 8.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for IEMG.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 2.25% for IEMG.
VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.09% for IEMG.
IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VWO and IEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer