VWO vs. EEM
VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index, while EEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VWO returned 8.97%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for EEM. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VWO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for EEM.
Performance
VWO vs. EEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 23.41% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed EEM with an annualized return of 8.97%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.87% annualized return.
VWO
- 1D
- -3.07%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.67%
- 1Y
- 27.03%
- 3Y*
- 17.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.09%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
EEM
- 1D
- -5.67%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 23.41%
- 6M
- 24.32%
- 1Y
- 46.62%
- 3Y*
- 22.58%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
VWO vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 10.55% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 23.41% | 33.98% | 6.49% | 8.95% | -20.56% | -3.63% | 17.02% | 18.22% | -15.31% | 37.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWO and EEM is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005 | 0.97 |
The correlation between VWO and EEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
VWO vs. EEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWO
EEM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VWO
EEM
Financial Services
VWO
EEM
Consumer Cyclical
VWO
EEM
Basic Materials
VWO
EEM
Industrials
VWO
EEM
Communication Services
VWO
EEM
Energy
VWO
EEM
Healthcare
VWO
EEM
Consumer Defensive
VWO
EEM
Utilities
VWO
EEM
Real Estate
VWO
EEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWO vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank
VWO
EEM
VWO vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VWO | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.39 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 3.46 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.56 | 12.70 | -4.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VWO vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, roughly equal to the maximum EEM drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and EEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWO | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.68% | -66.43% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -13.52% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.37% | -17.29% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.60% | -37.49% | +4.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | -39.82% | +3.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.07% | -5.67% | +2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.79% | -15.99% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 3.68% | -0.51% |
Volatility
VWO vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) is 7.37%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a volatility of 12.59%. This indicates that VWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWO | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 12.59% | -5.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.62% | 20.73% | -6.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.94% | 22.77% | -5.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 19.55% | -1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 20.67% | -1.49% |
VWO vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
VWO vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison
VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than EEM's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 1.66% | 2.22% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.49% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.33% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, VWO and EEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EEM has higher volatility (12.59%) compared to VWO (7.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs EEM's -66.43%.
On 10-year performance, EEM leads with 9.87% vs 8.97% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 7.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EEM has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 8.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.66% for EEM.
VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.72% for EEM.
EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VWO and EEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer