PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUSE vs. IMCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUSE vs. IMCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (VUSE) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUSE achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly lower than IMCV's 9.96% return. Over the past 10 years, VUSE has outperformed IMCV with an annualized return of 12.38%, while IMCV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.40% annualized return.


VUSE

1D
-0.51%
1M
5.30%
YTD
9.45%
6M
9.20%
1Y
18.48%
3Y*
17.51%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
12.38%

IMCV

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.12%
YTD
9.96%
6M
11.32%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
10.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUSE vs. IMCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VUSE
Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF
9.45%13.18%15.77%24.36%-9.42%35.46%6.76%20.74%-15.25%16.62%
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
9.96%13.52%12.28%11.89%-6.98%33.56%-4.11%24.72%-10.93%12.60%

Correlation

The correlation between VUSE and IMCV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2014

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between VUSE and IMCV has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VUSE vs. IMCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUSE
IMCV

Technology

33.1%
9.1%

Financial Services

14.1%
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
8.7%

Healthcare

9.5%
8.5%

Communication Services

9.4%
2.5%

Industrials

8.6%
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
8.9%

Basic Materials

2.7%
6.5%

Energy

2.6%
12.5%

Utilities

1.3%
10.0%

Real Estate

1.0%
5.6%

Technology

VUSE
33.1%
IMCV
9.1%

Financial Services

VUSE
14.1%
IMCV
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VUSE
10.5%
IMCV
8.7%

Healthcare

VUSE
9.5%
IMCV
8.5%

Communication Services

VUSE
9.4%
IMCV
2.5%

Industrials

VUSE
8.6%
IMCV
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

VUSE
7.3%
IMCV
8.9%

Basic Materials

VUSE
2.7%
IMCV
6.5%

Energy

VUSE
2.6%
IMCV
12.5%

Utilities

VUSE
1.3%
IMCV
10.0%

Real Estate

VUSE
1.0%
IMCV
5.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUSE vs. IMCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUSE
VUSE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
VUSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUSE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VUSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUSE Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCV
IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUSE vs. IMCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (VUSE) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUSEIMCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

3.41

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.45

12.72

-5.26

VUSE vs. IMCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUSE Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the IMCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUSE and IMCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUSEIMCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

2.02

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.53

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.53

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.47

+0.07

Drawdowns

VUSE vs. IMCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUSE drawdown since its inception was -43.92%, smaller than the maximum IMCV drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSE and IMCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUSEIMCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.92%

-64.74%

+20.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-6.90%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.93%

-18.63%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.34%

-19.87%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.92%

-46.33%

+2.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-0.21%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.62%

-8.42%

+2.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

1.85%

+0.63%

Volatility

VUSE vs. IMCV - Volatility Comparison

Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (VUSE) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) at 2.56%. This indicates that VUSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUSEIMCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

2.56%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.49%

8.00%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.64%

11.63%

+1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.46%

16.63%

+0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.21%

19.66%

+0.55%

VUSE vs. IMCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUSE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCV's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

VUSE vs. IMCV - Dividend Comparison

VUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than IMCV's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.94%2.23%2.36%2.30%2.36%1.86%2.61%2.45%2.61%1.87%2.09%2.29%
VUSE
Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF
0.44%0.47%0.84%1.15%1.57%1.16%1.33%1.61%1.55%1.16%1.25%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUSE and IMCV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VUSE has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to IMCV (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUSE dropped -43.92% vs IMCV's -64.74%.

On 10-year performance, VUSE leads with 12.38% vs 10.40% for IMCV. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VUSE has performed better with a 12.38% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VUSE.

IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.44% for VUSE.

VUSE tracks Vident U.S. Quality Index, while IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vident and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for VUSE and 0.06% for IMCV.

IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUSE and IMCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer