PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUSE vs. RFV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUSE vs. RFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (VUSE) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUSE achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly lower than RFV's 13.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VUSE having a 12.44% annualized return and RFV not far ahead at 12.57%.


VUSE

1D
-0.35%
1M
5.75%
YTD
10.02%
6M
10.35%
1Y
19.95%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
11.13%
10Y*
12.44%

RFV

1D
1.72%
1M
2.80%
YTD
13.45%
6M
12.19%
1Y
27.66%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*
12.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUSE vs. RFV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VUSE
Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF
10.02%13.18%15.77%24.36%-9.42%35.46%6.76%20.74%-15.25%16.62%
RFV
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF
13.45%7.66%5.63%30.26%-3.99%33.02%9.61%24.98%-18.56%14.74%

Correlation

The correlation between VUSE and RFV is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2014

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between VUSE and RFV has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VUSE vs. RFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUSE
RFV

Technology

33.1%
12.9%

Financial Services

14.1%
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
24.4%

Healthcare

9.5%
0.7%

Communication Services

9.4%

-

Industrials

8.6%
11.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
9.1%

Basic Materials

2.7%
7.6%

Energy

2.6%
12.9%

Utilities

1.3%

-

Real Estate

1.0%
3.5%

Technology

VUSE
33.1%
RFV
12.9%

Financial Services

VUSE
14.1%
RFV
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VUSE
10.5%
RFV
24.4%

Healthcare

VUSE
9.5%
RFV
0.7%

Communication Services

VUSE
9.4%
RFV

-

Industrials

VUSE
8.6%
RFV
11.4%

Consumer Defensive

VUSE
7.3%
RFV
9.1%

Basic Materials

VUSE
2.7%
RFV
7.6%

Energy

VUSE
2.6%
RFV
12.9%

Utilities

VUSE
1.3%
RFV

-

Real Estate

VUSE
1.0%
RFV
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUSE vs. RFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUSE
VUSE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VUSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUSE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VUSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUSE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

RFV
RFV Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
RFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFV Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
RFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFV Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUSE vs. RFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (VUSE) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUSERFVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.59

1.53

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.25

2.32

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

2.13

+0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.17

6.29

+1.88

VUSE vs. RFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUSE Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the RFV Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUSE and RFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUSERFVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.53

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.46

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.50

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.38

+0.16

Drawdowns

VUSE vs. RFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUSE drawdown since its inception was -43.92%, smaller than the maximum RFV drawdown of -71.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSE and RFV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUSERFVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.92%

-71.82%

+27.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-12.51%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.93%

-24.65%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.34%

-24.65%

+3.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.92%

-52.24%

+8.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

0.00%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-9.80%

+4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

4.23%

-1.75%

Volatility

VUSE vs. RFV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (VUSE) is 2.91%, while Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that VUSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUSERFVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

4.80%

-1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.50%

11.86%

-2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

18.15%

-5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.46%

22.08%

-4.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.21%

25.00%

-4.79%

VUSE vs. RFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUSE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RFV's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VUSE vs. RFV - Dividend Comparison

VUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than RFV's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RFV
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF
1.84%2.07%1.31%1.27%2.05%1.60%1.52%1.71%1.39%1.36%0.88%1.79%
VUSE
Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF
0.44%0.47%0.84%1.15%1.57%1.16%1.33%1.61%1.55%1.16%1.25%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUSE and RFV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFV has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to VUSE (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUSE dropped -43.92% vs RFV's -71.82%.

On 10-year performance, RFV leads with 12.57% vs 12.44% for VUSE. On fees, RFV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, VUSE has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RFV has performed better with a 12.57% return vs 12.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RFV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VUSE.

RFV has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.44% for VUSE.

VUSE is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while RFV is Small Cap Value Equities. VUSE tracks Vident U.S. Quality Index, while RFV tracks S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. They also come from different issuers: Vident and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for VUSE and 0.35% for RFV.

VUSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUSE and RFV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer