VUG vs. QQQI

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. VUG is passively managed, while QQQI is actively managed. Over the past year, VUG returned 23.98% vs 25.24% for QQQI. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VUG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

VUG vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 5.80% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 8.55% return.

VUG

• 1D: -3.62%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 5.80%
• 6M: 4.57%
• 1Y: 23.98%
• 3Y*: 24.49%
• 5Y*: 14.33%
• 10Y*: 17.81%

QQQI

• 1D: -3.97%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 8.55%
• 6M: 7.71%
• 1Y: 25.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUG vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	5.80%	19.40%	27.08%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	8.55%	18.62%	19.83%

Correlation

The correlation between VUG and QQQI is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024	0.95

The correlation between VUG and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VUG vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VUG	QQQI
Technology	53.5%	53.3%
Communication Services	17.3%	15.7%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	12.1%
Healthcare	4.6%	4.3%
Financial Services	4.3%	0.3%
Industrials	3.6%	3.3%
Consumer Defensive	1.5%	7.7%
Real Estate	1.0%	0.1%
Utilities	0.9%	1.5%
Basic Materials	0.6%	1.2%
Energy	0.4%	0.7%

Return for Risk

VUG vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUG

VUG Risk / Return Rank: 38
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 57
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUG vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VUG	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	1.87	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	2.43	-0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.35	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.46	2.64	-1.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.09	11.74	-6.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VUG vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUG and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VUG	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.48	1.87	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	1.18	-0.57

Drawdowns

VUG vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	VUG	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.68%	-20.00%	-30.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.53%	-9.61%	-6.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.83%	-4.47%	-0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.09%	-2.20%	-4.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.72%	2.15%	+2.57%

Volatility

VUG vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 4.92%. This indicates that VUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VUG	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.17%	4.92%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.68%	10.68%	+2.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.26%	13.61%	+2.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.27%	17.25%	+5.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.47%	17.25%	+4.22%

VUG vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

VUG vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than QQQI's 13.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.79%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	0.39%	0.41%	0.47%	0.58%	0.70%	0.48%	0.66%	0.95%	1.32%	1.14%	1.39%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VUG and QQQI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, VUG and QQQI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, VUG or QQQI?

VUG has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to QQQI (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUG dropped -50.68% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

Which ETF is better, VUG or QQQI?

On 1-year performance, QQQI leads with 25.24% vs 23.98% for VUG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VUG or QQQI?

Over the 1-year period, QQQI has performed better with a 25.24% return vs 23.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VUG or QQQI?

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VUG or QQQI?

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.79%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.

What is the main difference between VUG and QQQI?

VUG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VUG and 0.68% for QQQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.