VUG vs. IJH
VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) and IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while IJH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VUG returned 17.88%/yr vs 11.45%/yr for IJH. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VUG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IJH.
Performance
VUG vs. IJH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly lower than IJH's 14.66% return. Over the past 10 years, VUG has outperformed IJH with an annualized return of 17.88%, while IJH has yielded a comparatively lower 11.45% annualized return.
VUG
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- 4.80%
- 6M
- 3.81%
- 1Y
- 21.18%
- 3Y*
- 23.60%
- 5Y*
- 13.74%
- 10Y*
- 17.88%
IJH
- 1D
- 2.51%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 14.66%
- 6M
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 25.20%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.10%
- 10Y*
- 11.45%
VUG vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 4.80% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 14.66% | 7.42% | 13.92% | 16.40% | -13.11% | 24.72% | 13.60% | 26.10% | -11.19% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUG and IJH is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.82 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VUG and IJH has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VUG vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUG
IJH
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
VUG
IJH
Communication Services
VUG
IJH
Consumer Cyclical
VUG
IJH
Healthcare
VUG
IJH
Financial Services
VUG
IJH
Industrials
VUG
IJH
Consumer Defensive
VUG
IJH
Real Estate
VUG
IJH
Utilities
VUG
IJH
Basic Materials
VUG
IJH
Energy
VUG
IJH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUG vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank
VUG
IJH
VUG vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VUG | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.28 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 2.87 | -1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | 10.47 | -6.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VUG vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, smaller than the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and IJH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUG | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.68% | -55.07% | +4.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.53% | -8.83% | -7.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | -24.10% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.61% | -24.10% | -11.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.61% | -42.18% | +6.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.73% | 0.00% | -5.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -7.56% | +0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 2.41% | +2.37% |
Volatility
VUG vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) at 5.07%. This indicates that VUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUG | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 5.07% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 11.85% | +1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.47% | 15.89% | +0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 19.80% | +2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 21.20% | +0.28% |
VUG vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUG vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison
VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than IJH's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUG and IJH have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VUG has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to IJH (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUG dropped -50.68% vs IJH's -55.07%.
On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 17.88% vs 11.45% for IJH. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IJH has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 17.88% return vs 11.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for IJH.
IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.
VUG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IJH is Mid Cap Blend Equities. VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VUG and 0.05% for IJH.
IJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VUG and IJH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer