PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWV vs. VONV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWV vs. VONV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWV achieves a 18.98% return, which is significantly higher than VONV's 15.03% return. Over the past 10 years, VTWV has underperformed VONV with an annualized return of 10.34%, while VONV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.34% annualized return.


VTWV

1D
1.31%
1M
2.63%
YTD
18.98%
6M
18.10%
1Y
43.90%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*
10.34%

VONV

1D
0.66%
1M
3.81%
YTD
15.03%
6M
15.63%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
18.96%
5Y*
10.44%
10Y*
11.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWV vs. VONV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
18.98%12.72%7.83%14.67%-14.46%27.90%4.88%22.44%-13.34%8.06%
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
15.03%15.81%14.28%11.40%-7.65%25.28%2.71%26.48%-8.45%13.59%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWV and VONV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.83

The correlation between VTWV and VONV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWV vs. VONV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWV
VONV

Financial Services

23.9%
18.9%

Industrials

11.9%
13.1%

Real Estate

10.4%
4.1%

Healthcare

10.2%
10.9%

Technology

10.0%
14.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
7.3%

Energy

8.9%
7.0%

Basic Materials

5.4%
3.8%

Utilities

5.2%
4.4%

Communication Services

2.7%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
7.2%

Financial Services

VTWV
23.9%
VONV
18.9%

Industrials

VTWV
11.9%
VONV
13.1%

Real Estate

VTWV
10.4%
VONV
4.1%

Healthcare

VTWV
10.2%
VONV
10.9%

Technology

VTWV
10.0%
VONV
14.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWV
9.2%
VONV
7.3%

Energy

VTWV
8.9%
VONV
7.0%

Basic Materials

VTWV
5.4%
VONV
3.8%

Utilities

VTWV
5.2%
VONV
4.4%

Communication Services

VTWV
2.7%
VONV
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

VTWV
2.2%
VONV
7.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWV vs. VONV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWV
VTWV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VTWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

VONV
VONV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VONV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VONV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWV vs. VONV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTWVVONVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.50

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.11

4.38

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.42

18.38

-0.96

VTWV vs. VONV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWV Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the VONV Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWV and VONV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTWVVONVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.76

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.71

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.66

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.72

-0.23

Drawdowns

VTWV vs. VONV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, which is greater than VONV's maximum drawdown of -38.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and VONV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWVVONVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.73%

-38.21%

-7.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-6.81%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.72%

-15.70%

-11.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.72%

-18.87%

-7.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.73%

-38.21%

-7.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

0.00%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-3.91%

-3.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

1.62%

+0.91%

Volatility

VTWV vs. VONV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) at 2.83%. This indicates that VTWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWVVONVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

2.83%

+2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

8.11%

+4.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.16%

10.82%

+7.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.73%

14.77%

+6.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

17.23%

+6.31%

VTWV vs. VONV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VONV's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTWV vs. VONV - Dividend Comparison

VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than VONV's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.62%1.82%1.97%2.10%2.22%1.67%2.25%2.30%2.56%2.18%2.39%2.38%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.56%1.79%1.78%2.02%2.07%1.60%1.49%1.82%2.04%1.63%1.57%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTWV and VONV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTWV has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to VONV (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWV dropped -45.73% vs VONV's -38.21%.

On 10-year performance, VONV leads with 11.34% vs 10.34% for VTWV. On fees, VONV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONV has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONV has performed better with a 11.34% return vs 10.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VTWV.

VONV has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 1.56% for VTWV.

VTWV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VONV is Large Cap Value Equities. VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while VONV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWV and 0.06% for VONV.

VONV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWV and VONV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer