VONV vs. RPV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

VONV (Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF) and RPV (Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - VONV tracks the Russell 1000 Value Index while RPV tracks the S&P 500 Pure Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VONV returned 11.68%/yr vs 11.15%/yr for RPV. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. VONV charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RPV.

Performance

VONV vs. RPV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONV achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly higher than RPV's 16.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VONV having a 11.68% annualized return and RPV not far behind at 11.15%.

VONV

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 2.02%
• 6M: 15.40%
• YTD: 20.63%
• 1Y: 32.99%
• 3Y*: 17.97%
• 5Y*: 11.77%
• 10Y*: 11.68%
• ALL TIME*: 12.10%

RPV

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 2.75%
• 6M: 12.21%
• YTD: 16.52%
• 1Y: 34.20%
• 3Y*: 16.76%
• 5Y*: 12.24%
• 10Y*: 11.15%
• ALL TIME*: 9.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF	$14.78M	$14.37M	$15.41M
VONV Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF	$67.85M	$88.58M	$94.83M

VONV vs. RPV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VONV Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF	20.63%	15.81%	14.28%	11.40%	-7.65%	25.28%	2.71%	26.48%	-8.45%	13.59%
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF	16.52%	17.70%	12.41%	7.98%	-1.27%	34.22%	-8.69%	24.80%	-12.31%	17.30%

Correlation

The correlation between VONV and RPV is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010	0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between VONV and RPV has dropped to 0.70 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VONV vs. RPV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VONV	RPV
Technology	19.9%	3.4%
Financial Services	18.6%	18.8%
Healthcare	12.7%	18.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.9%	11.4%
Industrials	10.5%	7.3%
Consumer Defensive	7.5%	13.0%
Energy	5.5%	9.6%
Utilities	3.9%	4.1%
Real Estate	3.8%	1.6%
Basic Materials	3.4%	7.5%
Communication Services	3.3%	5.2%

Return for Risk

VONV vs. RPV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VONV

VONV Risk / Return Rank: 94
VONV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
VONV Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
VONV Omega Ratio Rank: 94
VONV Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
VONV Martin Ratio Rank: 95

RPV

RPV Risk / Return Rank: 93
RPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
RPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
RPV Omega Ratio Rank: 92
RPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
RPV Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VONV vs. RPV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VONV	RPV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.75	2.63	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.83	3.77	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.45	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.58	4.23	+0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.65	15.58	+4.08

VONV vs. RPV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONV Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is comparable to the RPV Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONV and RPV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VONV vs. RPV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONV drawdown since its inception was -38.21%, smaller than the maximum RPV drawdown of -75.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONV and RPV.

Drawdown Indicators

	VONV	RPV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.21%	-75.32%	+37.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.81%	-7.74%	+0.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.70%	-14.90%	-0.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.87%	-22.64%	+3.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.21%	-50.67%	+12.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-1.82%	+1.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.87%	-10.61%	+6.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.59%	2.10%	-0.51%

Volatility

VONV vs. RPV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) is 2.84%, while Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that VONV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VONV	RPV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.84%	3.12%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.67%	8.20%	+0.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.40%	12.50%	-1.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.77%	17.60%	-2.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.20%	21.80%	-4.60%

VONV vs. RPV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than RPV's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

VONV vs. RPV - Dividend Comparison

VONV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than RPV's 2.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF	2.28%	2.50%	2.16%	2.38%	2.29%	1.92%	2.11%	2.28%	2.49%	1.73%	1.73%	2.39%
VONV Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF	1.56%	1.82%	1.97%	2.10%	2.22%	1.67%	2.25%	2.30%	2.56%	2.18%	2.39%	2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VONV and RPV in my portfolio?

VONV and RPV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VONV or RPV?

RPV has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to VONV (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONV dropped -38.21% vs RPV's -75.32%.

Which ETF is better, VONV or RPV?

On 10-year performance, VONV leads with 11.68% vs 11.15% for RPV. On fees, VONV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONV has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VONV or RPV?

Over the 10-year period, VONV has performed better with a 11.68% return vs 11.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VONV or RPV?

VONV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VONV or RPV?

RPV has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.56% for VONV.

What is the main difference between VONV and RPV?

VONV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while RPV tracks S&P 500 Pure Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONV and 0.35% for RPV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VONV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.