PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONV vs. VOE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONV vs. VOE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONV achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than VOE's 10.75% return. Over the past 10 years, VONV has outperformed VOE with an annualized return of 11.35%, while VOE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.55% annualized return.


VONV

1D
0.00%
1M
4.28%
YTD
14.28%
6M
14.88%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
11.35%

VOE

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.35%
YTD
10.75%
6M
11.62%
1Y
22.73%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
10.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONV vs. VOE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
14.28%15.81%14.28%11.40%-7.65%25.28%2.71%26.48%-8.45%13.59%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
10.75%12.08%14.00%9.85%-7.97%28.78%2.65%27.85%-12.48%17.07%

Correlation

The correlation between VONV and VOE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.94

The correlation between VONV and VOE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VONV vs. VOE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VONV
VOE

Financial Services

18.9%
16.5%

Technology

14.9%
10.9%

Industrials

13.1%
14.0%

Healthcare

10.9%
6.3%

Communication Services

8.5%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
7.9%

Energy

7.0%
12.8%

Utilities

4.4%
12.1%

Real Estate

4.1%
6.0%

Basic Materials

3.8%
5.8%

Financial Services

VONV
18.9%
VOE
16.5%

Technology

VONV
14.9%
VOE
10.9%

Industrials

VONV
13.1%
VOE
14.0%

Healthcare

VONV
10.9%
VOE
6.3%

Communication Services

VONV
8.5%
VOE
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VONV
7.3%
VOE
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

VONV
7.2%
VOE
7.9%

Energy

VONV
7.0%
VOE
12.8%

Utilities

VONV
4.4%
VOE
12.1%

Real Estate

VONV
4.1%
VOE
6.0%

Basic Materials

VONV
3.8%
VOE
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONV vs. VOE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONV
VONV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VONV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VONV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VOE
VOE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONV vs. VOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VONVVOEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.35

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

3.30

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.54

12.51

+5.03

VONV vs. VOE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONV Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the VOE Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONV and VOE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VONVVOEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

1.99

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.53

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.56

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.44

+0.27

Drawdowns

VONV vs. VOE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONV drawdown since its inception was -38.21%, smaller than the maximum VOE drawdown of -61.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONV and VOE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONVVOEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.21%

-61.50%

+23.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-6.93%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.70%

-18.45%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.87%

-19.70%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.21%

-43.18%

+4.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.16%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-8.35%

+4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.82%

-0.20%

Volatility

VONV vs. VOE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) at 2.58%. This indicates that VONV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONVVOEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

2.58%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

8.13%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.81%

11.47%

-0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.77%

16.03%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.24%

18.83%

-1.59%

VONV vs. VOE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than VOE's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VONV vs. VOE - Dividend Comparison

VONV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than VOE's 1.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.88%2.10%2.11%2.27%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.05%2.75%1.86%1.92%2.05%
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.63%1.82%1.97%2.10%2.22%1.67%2.25%2.30%2.56%2.18%2.39%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VONV and VOE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VONV has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to VOE (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONV dropped -38.21% vs VOE's -61.50%.

On 10-year performance, VONV leads with 11.35% vs 10.55% for VOE. On fees, VONV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VOE has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONV has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 10.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VOE.

VOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.63% for VONV.

VONV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VOE is Mid Cap Value Equities. VONV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONV and 0.07% for VOE.

VONV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONV and VOE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer