VONV vs. IWD
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD).
VONV and IWD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VONV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Value Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010. IWD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Value Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both VONV and IWD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VONV or IWD.
Key characteristics
| VONV | IWD | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 20.60% | 19.63% |
| 1Y Return | 33.47% | 32.36% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.89% | 7.50% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.66% | 10.38% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.19% | 9.00% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.19 | 2.93 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.47 | 4.14 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.59 | 1.54 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.17 | 3.77 |
| Martin Ratio | 20.26 | 18.71 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.72% | 1.73% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.91% | 11.02% |
| Max Drawdown | -38.21% | -60.10% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between VONV and IWD is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VONV vs. IWD - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VONV having a 20.60% return and IWD slightly lower at 19.63%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VONV having a 9.19% annualized return and IWD not far behind at 9.00%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VONV vs. IWD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VONV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IWD's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VONV vs. IWD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VONV vs. IWD - Dividend Comparison
VONV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than IWD's 1.77% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONV Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF | 1.88% | 2.09% | 2.23% | 1.67% | 2.25% | 2.30% | 2.56% | 2.18% | 2.39% | 2.38% | 2.10% | 1.92% |
IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 1.77% | 2.02% | 2.15% | 1.62% | 2.05% | 2.45% | 2.71% | 2.09% | 2.25% | 2.47% | 2.00% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
VONV vs. IWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VONV drawdown since its inception was -38.21%, smaller than the maximum IWD drawdown of -60.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONV and IWD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VONV vs. IWD - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) have volatilities of 3.72% and 3.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.