VTWV vs. VIG
VTWV (Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTWV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTWV returned 10.32%/yr vs 13.23%/yr for VIG. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTWV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
VTWV vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWV achieves a 17.44% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 7.57% return. Over the past 10 years, VTWV has underperformed VIG with an annualized return of 10.32%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.
VTWV
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- 17.44%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- 1Y
- 41.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
VIG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 19.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
VTWV vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 17.44% | 12.72% | 7.83% | 14.67% | -14.46% | 27.90% | 4.88% | 22.44% | -13.34% | 8.06% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.57% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWV and VIG is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010 | 0.74 |
The correlation between VTWV and VIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTWV vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTWV
VIG
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
VTWV
VIG
Industrials
VTWV
VIG
Real Estate
VTWV
VIG
-
Healthcare
VTWV
VIG
Technology
VTWV
VIG
Consumer Cyclical
VTWV
VIG
Energy
VTWV
VIG
Basic Materials
VTWV
VIG
Utilities
VTWV
VIG
Communication Services
VTWV
VIG
Consumer Defensive
VTWV
VIG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTWV vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
VTWV
VIG
VTWV vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTWV | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.35 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | 2.49 | +2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.46 | 10.06 | +6.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTWV | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 1.97 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.75 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.83 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.60 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
VTWV vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, roughly equal to the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWV | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.73% | -46.81% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -7.91% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.72% | -14.95% | -11.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.72% | -20.39% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.73% | -31.72% | -14.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -0.19% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.81% | -5.51% | -2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 1.96% | +0.57% |
Volatility
VTWV vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.19%. This indicates that VTWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTWV | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 2.19% | +2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.15% | 7.57% | +4.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.17% | 10.01% | +8.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 14.23% | +7.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.54% | 16.05% | +7.49% |
VTWV vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTWV vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than VIG's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.58% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTWV and VIG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTWV has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to VIG (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWV dropped -45.73% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.23% vs 10.32% for VTWV. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.23% return vs 10.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VTWV.
VTWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.47% for VIG.
VTWV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VIG is Dividend. VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWV and 0.04% for VIG.
VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTWV and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer