VTWV vs. USVM
VTWV (Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF) and USVM (VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTWV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index, while USVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VTWV returned 6.94%/yr vs 9.96%/yr for USVM. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTWV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for USVM.
Performance
VTWV vs. USVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWV achieves a 18.98% return, which is significantly higher than USVM's 16.40% return.
VTWV
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- 18.98%
- 6M
- 18.10%
- 1Y
- 43.90%
- 3Y*
- 19.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
USVM
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 16.40%
- 6M
- 16.14%
- 1Y
- 32.38%
- 3Y*
- 20.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.96%
- 10Y*
- —
VTWV vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 18.98% | 12.72% | 7.83% | 14.67% | -14.46% | 27.90% | 4.88% | 22.44% | -13.34% | 2.06% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 16.40% | 10.56% | 16.59% | 18.90% | -13.23% | 24.44% | 11.56% | 21.65% | -9.39% | 2.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWV and USVM is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.94 |
The correlation between VTWV and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTWV vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTWV
USVM
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
VTWV
USVM
Industrials
VTWV
USVM
Real Estate
VTWV
USVM
Healthcare
VTWV
USVM
Technology
VTWV
USVM
Consumer Cyclical
VTWV
USVM
Energy
VTWV
USVM
Basic Materials
VTWV
USVM
Utilities
VTWV
USVM
Communication Services
VTWV
USVM
Consumer Defensive
VTWV
USVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTWV vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank
VTWV
USVM
VTWV vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTWV | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.38 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.11 | 3.89 | +1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.42 | 14.65 | +2.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTWV | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.18 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.51 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
VTWV vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, which is greater than USVM's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and USVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWV | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.73% | -42.38% | -3.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -8.36% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.72% | -24.34% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.72% | -25.27% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | 0.00% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.81% | -7.90% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 2.22% | +0.31% |
Volatility
VTWV vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) at 4.32%. This indicates that VTWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTWV | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 4.32% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.20% | 10.76% | +1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 14.93% | +3.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 19.65% | +2.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.54% | 22.01% | +1.53% |
VTWV vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTWV vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison
VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than USVM's 1.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 1.74% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 0.70% | 1.21% | 1.77% | 1.43% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.56% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, VTWV and USVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTWV has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to USVM (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWV dropped -45.73% vs USVM's -42.38%.
On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 9.96% vs 6.94% for VTWV. On fees, VTWV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 9.96% return vs 6.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTWV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for USVM.
USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 1.56% for VTWV.
VTWV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while USVM is Momentum. VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWV and 0.29% for USVM.
VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTWV and USVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer