PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWV vs. USVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWV vs. USVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWV achieves a 18.98% return, which is significantly higher than USVM's 16.40% return.


VTWV

1D
1.31%
1M
2.63%
YTD
18.98%
6M
18.10%
1Y
43.90%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*
10.34%

USVM

1D
0.99%
1M
1.96%
YTD
16.40%
6M
16.14%
1Y
32.38%
3Y*
20.65%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWV vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
18.98%12.72%7.83%14.67%-14.46%27.90%4.88%22.44%-13.34%2.06%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
16.40%10.56%16.59%18.90%-13.23%24.44%11.56%21.65%-9.39%2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWV and USVM is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.94

The correlation between VTWV and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWV vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWV
USVM

Financial Services

23.9%
22.0%

Industrials

11.9%
12.1%

Real Estate

10.4%
11.9%

Healthcare

10.2%
11.0%

Technology

10.0%
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
11.1%

Energy

8.9%
4.4%

Basic Materials

5.4%
1.8%

Utilities

5.2%
6.4%

Communication Services

2.7%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
5.0%

Financial Services

VTWV
23.9%
USVM
22.0%

Industrials

VTWV
11.9%
USVM
12.1%

Real Estate

VTWV
10.4%
USVM
11.9%

Healthcare

VTWV
10.2%
USVM
11.0%

Technology

VTWV
10.0%
USVM
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWV
9.2%
USVM
11.1%

Energy

VTWV
8.9%
USVM
4.4%

Basic Materials

VTWV
5.4%
USVM
1.8%

Utilities

VTWV
5.2%
USVM
6.4%

Communication Services

VTWV
2.7%
USVM
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

VTWV
2.2%
USVM
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWV vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWV
VTWV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VTWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWV vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTWVUSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.38

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.11

3.89

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.42

14.65

+2.77

VTWV vs. USVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWV Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the USVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWV and USVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTWVUSVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.18

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.51

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.49

0.00

Drawdowns

VTWV vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, which is greater than USVM's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and USVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWVUSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.73%

-42.38%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-8.36%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.72%

-24.34%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.72%

-25.27%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

0.00%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-7.90%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

2.22%

+0.31%

Volatility

VTWV vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) at 4.32%. This indicates that VTWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWVUSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

4.32%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

10.76%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.16%

14.93%

+3.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.73%

19.65%

+2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

22.01%

+1.53%

VTWV vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTWV vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison

VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than USVM's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.74%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%0.00%0.00%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.56%1.79%1.78%2.02%2.07%1.60%1.49%1.82%2.04%1.63%1.57%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VTWV and USVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWV has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to USVM (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWV dropped -45.73% vs USVM's -42.38%.

On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 9.96% vs 6.94% for VTWV. On fees, VTWV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 9.96% return vs 6.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for USVM.

USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 1.56% for VTWV.

VTWV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while USVM is Momentum. VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWV and 0.29% for USVM.

VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWV and USVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer