USVM vs. LGLV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

USVM (VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF) and LGLV (SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index, while LGLV is a Low Volatility fund tracking the State Street U.S. Large Cap Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USVM returned 11.10%/yr vs 8.32%/yr for LGLV. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. USVM charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for LGLV.

Performance

USVM vs. LGLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USVM achieves a 21.09% return, which is significantly higher than LGLV's 7.61% return.

USVM

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 0.81%
• 6M: 15.17%
• YTD: 21.09%
• 1Y: 35.70%
• 3Y*: 18.46%
• 5Y*: 11.10%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.10%

LGLV

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 3.70%
• YTD: 7.61%
• 1Y: 10.51%
• 3Y*: 11.84%
• 5Y*: 8.32%
• 10Y*: 11.19%
• ALL TIME*: 11.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF	$5.56M	$4.60M	$5.45M
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF	$4.40M	$4.64M	$4.70M

USVM vs. LGLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF	21.09%	10.56%	16.59%	18.90%	-13.23%	24.44%	11.56%	21.65%	-9.39%	2.06%
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF	7.61%	8.37%	16.22%	9.19%	-8.17%	27.95%	7.42%	30.83%	0.32%	3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between USVM and LGLV is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017	0.72

The correlation between USVM and LGLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USVM vs. LGLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USVM	LGLV
Financial Services	24.6%	10.0%
Healthcare	12.6%	7.3%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	9.1%
Industrials	10.8%	18.7%
Technology	9.6%	9.0%
Real Estate	9.4%	17.8%
Utilities	7.3%	11.8%
Energy	5.0%	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	5.6%
Communication Services	3.0%	3.9%
Basic Materials	1.7%	3.4%

Return for Risk

USVM vs. LGLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USVM

USVM Risk / Return Rank: 91
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 89
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 92

LGLV

LGLV Risk / Return Rank: 39
LGLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
LGLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
LGLV Omega Ratio Rank: 37
LGLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
LGLV Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USVM vs. LGLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USVM	LGLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	0.99	+1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.38	1.53	+1.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.17	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.06	1.47	+2.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.72	3.41	+12.30

USVM vs. LGLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the LGLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USVM and LGLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USVM vs. LGLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USVM drawdown since its inception was -42.38%, which is greater than LGLV's maximum drawdown of -36.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USVM and LGLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	USVM	LGLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.38%	-36.64%	-5.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.36%	-6.86%	-1.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.34%	-10.17%	-14.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.27%	-17.49%	-7.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.11%	-2.14%	+1.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.76%	-3.21%	-4.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	2.95%	-0.80%

Volatility

USVM vs. LGLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) is 2.91%, while SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that USVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USVM	LGLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	4.53%	-1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.68%	7.99%	+2.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.64%	10.16%	+4.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.45%	13.03%	+6.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.86%	16.09%	+5.77%

USVM vs. LGLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

USVM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than LGLV's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

USVM vs. LGLV - Dividend Comparison

USVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than LGLV's 1.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF	1.99%	1.94%	1.93%	2.03%	1.95%	1.65%	1.98%	1.89%	2.09%	4.39%	2.54%	2.97%
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF	1.82%	1.84%	1.75%	1.63%	1.43%	0.70%	1.21%	1.77%	1.43%	0.65%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USVM and LGLV in my portfolio?

USVM and LGLV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USVM or LGLV?

LGLV has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to USVM (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USVM dropped -42.38% vs LGLV's -36.64%.

Which ETF is better, USVM or LGLV?

On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 11.10% vs 8.32% for LGLV. On fees, LGLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USVM or LGLV?

Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 11.10% return vs 8.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USVM or LGLV?

LGLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for USVM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USVM or LGLV?

LGLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.82% for USVM.

What is the main difference between USVM and LGLV?

USVM is categorized as Momentum, while LGLV is Low Volatility. USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index, while LGLV tracks State Street U.S. Large Cap Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for USVM and 0.12% for LGLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.