PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USVM vs. LGLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USVM vs. LGLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USVM achieves a 15.72% return, which is significantly higher than LGLV's 0.89% return.


USVM

1D
1.03%
1M
2.09%
YTD
15.72%
6M
16.31%
1Y
32.37%
3Y*
19.95%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*

LGLV

1D
0.26%
1M
-2.37%
YTD
0.89%
6M
1.52%
1Y
3.01%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
7.82%
10Y*
11.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USVM vs. LGLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
15.72%10.56%16.59%18.90%-13.23%24.44%11.56%21.65%-9.39%2.21%
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
0.89%8.37%16.22%9.19%-8.17%27.95%7.42%30.83%0.32%2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between USVM and LGLV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.73

The correlation between USVM and LGLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

USVM vs. LGLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USVM
LGLV

Financial Services

22.0%
9.9%

Industrials

12.1%
18.4%

Real Estate

11.9%
17.4%

Technology

11.6%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
9.4%

Healthcare

11.0%
7.0%

Utilities

6.4%
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
5.9%

Energy

4.4%
3.7%

Communication Services

2.8%
4.2%

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.5%

Financial Services

USVM
22.0%
LGLV
9.9%

Industrials

USVM
12.1%
LGLV
18.4%

Real Estate

USVM
11.9%
LGLV
17.4%

Technology

USVM
11.6%
LGLV
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

USVM
11.1%
LGLV
9.4%

Healthcare

USVM
11.0%
LGLV
7.0%

Utilities

USVM
6.4%
LGLV
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

USVM
5.0%
LGLV
5.9%

Energy

USVM
4.4%
LGLV
3.7%

Communication Services

USVM
2.8%
LGLV
4.2%

Basic Materials

USVM
1.8%
LGLV
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USVM vs. LGLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

LGLV
LGLV Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
LGLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
LGLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGLV Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USVM vs. LGLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USVMLGLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.18

0.33

+1.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.14

0.54

+2.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.06

+0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

0.45

+3.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.54

1.17

+13.37

USVM vs. LGLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the LGLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USVM and LGLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USVMLGLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

0.33

+1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.61

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.76

-0.27

Drawdowns

USVM vs. LGLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USVM drawdown since its inception was -42.38%, which is greater than LGLV's maximum drawdown of -36.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USVM and LGLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USVMLGLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.38%

-36.64%

-5.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-6.86%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.34%

-10.17%

-14.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.27%

-17.49%

-7.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-6.54%

+6.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.90%

-3.21%

-4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.64%

-0.42%

Volatility

USVM vs. LGLV - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) at 2.48%. This indicates that USVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USVMLGLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

2.48%

+2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.77%

6.59%

+4.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.93%

9.20%

+5.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

12.91%

+6.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.01%

16.06%

+5.95%

USVM vs. LGLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

USVM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than LGLV's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

USVM vs. LGLV - Dividend Comparison

USVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than LGLV's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.04%1.94%1.93%2.03%1.95%1.65%1.98%1.89%2.09%4.39%2.54%2.97%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.75%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USVM and LGLV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USVM has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to LGLV (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USVM dropped -42.38% vs LGLV's -36.64%.

On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 9.92% vs 7.82% for LGLV. On fees, LGLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, LGLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 9.92% return vs 7.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LGLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for USVM.

LGLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.75% for USVM.

USVM is categorized as Momentum, while LGLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index, while LGLV tracks SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR). They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for USVM and 0.12% for LGLV.

USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USVM and LGLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer