PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USVM vs. ULVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USVM vs. ULVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USVM achieves a 18.75% return, which is significantly higher than ULVM's 16.65% return.


USVM

1D
0.05%
1M
4.06%
YTD
18.75%
6M
16.97%
1Y
32.76%
3Y*
20.77%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*

ULVM

1D
0.10%
1M
2.65%
YTD
16.65%
6M
15.46%
1Y
28.69%
3Y*
21.42%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USVM vs. ULVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
18.75%10.56%16.59%18.90%-13.23%24.44%11.56%21.65%-9.39%2.06%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
16.65%15.84%19.76%10.16%-9.04%31.06%3.51%22.08%-12.07%4.11%

Correlation

The correlation between USVM and ULVM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017

0.91

The correlation between USVM and ULVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

USVM vs. ULVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USVM
ULVM

Financial Services

21.6%
22.6%

Technology

12.5%
13.5%

Industrials

12.4%
12.3%

Real Estate

12.1%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
5.4%

Healthcare

11.3%
10.2%

Utilities

5.9%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.6%

Energy

4.0%
3.3%

Communication Services

2.5%
3.4%

Basic Materials

1.6%
4.1%

Financial Services

USVM
21.6%
ULVM
22.6%

Technology

USVM
12.5%
ULVM
13.5%

Industrials

USVM
12.4%
ULVM
12.3%

Real Estate

USVM
12.1%
ULVM
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

USVM
11.3%
ULVM
5.4%

Healthcare

USVM
11.3%
ULVM
10.2%

Utilities

USVM
5.9%
ULVM
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

USVM
4.8%
ULVM
4.6%

Energy

USVM
4.0%
ULVM
3.3%

Communication Services

USVM
2.5%
ULVM
3.4%

Basic Materials

USVM
1.6%
ULVM
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USVM vs. ULVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

ULVM
ULVM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ULVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULVM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ULVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USVM vs. ULVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USVMULVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.46

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

4.46

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.82

18.39

-3.57

USVM vs. ULVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the ULVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USVM and ULVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USVM vs. ULVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USVM drawdown since its inception was -42.38%, roughly equal to the maximum ULVM drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USVM and ULVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USVMULVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.38%

-40.71%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-6.47%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.34%

-18.14%

-6.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.27%

-19.77%

-5.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.52%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-5.72%

-2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

1.56%

+0.66%

Volatility

USVM vs. ULVM - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) at 3.34%. This indicates that USVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USVMULVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

3.34%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

8.31%

+2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

10.92%

+4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.64%

15.48%

+4.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.97%

18.82%

+3.15%

USVM vs. ULVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

USVM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than ULVM's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

USVM vs. ULVM - Dividend Comparison

USVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than ULVM's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
1.62%1.81%1.57%1.94%1.91%1.36%1.51%1.88%1.67%0.38%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.77%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


USVM and ULVM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USVM has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to ULVM (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USVM dropped -42.38% vs ULVM's -40.71%.

On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 12.23% vs 10.06% for USVM. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 12.23% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for USVM.

USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.62% for ULVM.

USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index, while ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for USVM and 0.20% for ULVM.

ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USVM and ULVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer