USVM vs. XMMO
USVM (VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - USVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index while XMMO tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USVM returned 10.38%/yr vs 16.76%/yr for XMMO. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USVM charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
USVM vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USVM achieves a 18.69% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 25.95% return.
USVM
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 4.01%
- YTD
- 18.69%
- 6M
- 16.33%
- 1Y
- 33.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.38%
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 5.63%
- YTD
- 25.95%
- 6M
- 23.04%
- 1Y
- 40.85%
- 3Y*
- 32.12%
- 5Y*
- 16.76%
- 10Y*
- 20.42%
USVM vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 18.69% | 10.56% | 16.59% | 18.90% | -13.23% | 24.44% | 11.56% | 21.65% | -9.39% | 2.06% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 25.95% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 7.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between USVM and XMMO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017 | 0.86 |
The correlation between USVM and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
USVM vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USVM
XMMO
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
USVM
XMMO
Technology
USVM
XMMO
Industrials
USVM
XMMO
Real Estate
USVM
XMMO
Consumer Cyclical
USVM
XMMO
Healthcare
USVM
XMMO
Utilities
USVM
XMMO
Consumer Defensive
USVM
XMMO
Energy
USVM
XMMO
Communication Services
USVM
XMMO
Basic Materials
USVM
XMMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USVM vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
USVM
XMMO
USVM vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USVM | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.36 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.06 | 4.92 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.28 | 19.55 | -4.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USVM vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USVM drawdown since its inception was -42.38%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USVM and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USVM | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.38% | -55.37% | +12.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.36% | -8.34% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.34% | -24.93% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.27% | -27.91% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | 0.00% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.86% | -9.43% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 2.09% | +0.13% |
Volatility
USVM vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) is 4.10%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that USVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USVM | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.10% | 8.04% | -3.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 16.60% | -5.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.99% | 19.82% | -4.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 21.62% | -1.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 22.35% | -0.38% |
USVM vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
USVM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
USVM vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
USVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than XMMO's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 1.77% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 0.70% | 1.21% | 1.77% | 1.43% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.74% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USVM and XMMO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (8.04%) compared to USVM (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USVM dropped -42.38% vs XMMO's -55.37%.
On 5-year performance, XMMO leads with 16.76% vs 10.38% for USVM. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 16.76% return vs 10.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.
USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.74% for XMMO.
USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for USVM and 0.35% for XMMO.
USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USVM and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer