VTWV vs. SLYV
VTWV (Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF) and SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds - VTWV tracks the Russell 2000 Value Index while SLYV tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTWV returned 10.32%/yr vs 10.18%/yr for SLYV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTWV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SLYV.
Performance
VTWV vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWV achieves a 17.44% return, which is significantly higher than SLYV's 15.25% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTWV having a 10.32% annualized return and SLYV not far behind at 10.18%.
VTWV
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- 17.44%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- 1Y
- 41.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
SLYV
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 15.25%
- 6M
- 14.70%
- 1Y
- 37.01%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
VTWV vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 17.44% | 12.72% | 7.83% | 14.67% | -14.46% | 27.90% | 4.88% | 22.44% | -13.34% | 8.06% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 15.25% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWV and SLYV is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010 | 0.93 |
The correlation between VTWV and SLYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTWV vs. SLYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTWV
SLYV
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
VTWV
SLYV
Industrials
VTWV
SLYV
Real Estate
VTWV
SLYV
Healthcare
VTWV
SLYV
Technology
VTWV
SLYV
Consumer Cyclical
VTWV
SLYV
Energy
VTWV
SLYV
Basic Materials
VTWV
SLYV
Utilities
VTWV
SLYV
Communication Services
VTWV
SLYV
Consumer Defensive
VTWV
SLYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTWV vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank
VTWV
SLYV
VTWV vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTWV | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.35 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | 3.97 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.46 | 13.09 | +3.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTWV | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.05 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.26 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.43 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.46 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
VTWV vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, smaller than the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and SLYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWV | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.73% | -61.15% | +15.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -9.36% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.72% | -28.68% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.72% | -28.68% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.73% | -47.73% | +2.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -1.18% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.81% | -8.94% | +1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 2.83% | -0.30% |
Volatility
VTWV vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) at 4.42%. This indicates that VTWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTWV | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 4.42% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.15% | 11.46% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.17% | 18.26% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 21.96% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.54% | 23.96% | -0.42% |
VTWV vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTWV vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison
VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than SLYV's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.58% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, VTWV and SLYV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTWV has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to SLYV (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWV dropped -45.73% vs SLYV's -61.15%.
On 10-year performance, VTWV leads with 10.32% vs 10.18% for SLYV. On fees, VTWV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTWV has performed better with a 10.32% return vs 10.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTWV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYV.
SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.58% for VTWV.
VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWV and 0.15% for SLYV.
VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTWV and SLYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer