PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYV vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYV vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly higher than VBR's 13.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLYV having a 10.63% annualized return and VBR not far ahead at 11.02%.


SLYV

1D
-0.20%
1M
3.12%
YTD
17.70%
6M
15.50%
1Y
39.46%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
10.63%

VBR

1D
0.18%
1M
2.65%
YTD
13.42%
6M
11.41%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
11.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLYV vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
17.70%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
13.42%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYV and VBR is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.96

The correlation between SLYV and VBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLYV vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLYV
VBR

Financial Services

19.5%
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%
12.5%

Technology

13.4%
12.1%

Industrials

11.6%
17.4%

Real Estate

8.6%
10.5%

Healthcare

7.3%
8.3%

Energy

7.0%
4.3%

Basic Materials

6.9%
6.0%

Communication Services

4.4%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
4.0%

Utilities

2.1%
4.6%

Financial Services

SLYV
19.5%
VBR
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SLYV
15.4%
VBR
12.5%

Technology

SLYV
13.4%
VBR
12.1%

Industrials

SLYV
11.6%
VBR
17.4%

Real Estate

SLYV
8.6%
VBR
10.5%

Healthcare

SLYV
7.3%
VBR
8.3%

Energy

SLYV
7.0%
VBR
4.3%

Basic Materials

SLYV
6.9%
VBR
6.0%

Communication Services

SLYV
4.4%
VBR
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

SLYV
3.8%
VBR
4.0%

Utilities

SLYV
2.1%
VBR
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYV vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLYV vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLYVVBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.31

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

3.14

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.05

11.11

+2.94

SLYV vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYV Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYV and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLYV vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, roughly equal to the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYVVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.15%

-61.98%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-8.85%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.68%

-24.19%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

-24.19%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.73%

-45.28%

-2.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-1.03%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-8.25%

-0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.50%

+0.32%

Volatility

SLYV vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) at 3.97%. This indicates that SLYV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYVVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

3.97%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

10.66%

+1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.31%

15.33%

+2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.91%

19.73%

+2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.98%

21.75%

+2.23%

SLYV vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLYV vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than VBR's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
2.28%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.73%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SLYV and VBR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SLYV has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to VBR (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs VBR's -61.98%.

On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 11.02% vs 10.63% for SLYV. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 11.02% return vs 10.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYV.

SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.73% for VBR.

SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.05% for VBR.

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYV and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer