SLYV vs. VBR
SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) and VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds - SLYV tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index while VBR tracks the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLYV returned 10.63%/yr vs 11.02%/yr for VBR. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SLYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VBR.
Performance
SLYV vs. VBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly higher than VBR's 13.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLYV having a 10.63% annualized return and VBR not far ahead at 11.02%.
SLYV
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- 17.70%
- 6M
- 15.50%
- 1Y
- 39.46%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.63%
VBR
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 13.42%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- 27.72%
- 3Y*
- 16.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
SLYV vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 17.70% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 13.42% | 9.09% | 12.40% | 16.00% | -9.38% | 28.08% | 5.90% | 22.78% | -12.28% | 11.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYV and VBR is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.96 |
The correlation between SLYV and VBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SLYV vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYV
VBR
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
SLYV
VBR
Consumer Cyclical
SLYV
VBR
Technology
SLYV
VBR
Industrials
SLYV
VBR
Real Estate
SLYV
VBR
Healthcare
SLYV
VBR
Energy
SLYV
VBR
Basic Materials
SLYV
VBR
Communication Services
SLYV
VBR
Consumer Defensive
SLYV
VBR
Utilities
SLYV
VBR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYV vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank
SLYV
VBR
SLYV vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLYV | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.31 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 3.14 | +1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.05 | 11.11 | +2.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLYV vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, roughly equal to the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and VBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYV | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -61.98% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -8.85% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.68% | -24.19% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -24.19% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.73% | -45.28% | -2.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -1.03% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.93% | -8.25% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.50% | +0.32% |
Volatility
SLYV vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) at 3.97%. This indicates that SLYV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYV | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 3.97% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.73% | 10.66% | +1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.31% | 15.33% | +2.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.91% | 19.73% | +2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.98% | 21.75% | +2.23% |
SLYV vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SLYV vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison
SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than VBR's 1.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 2.28% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.73% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SLYV and VBR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SLYV has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to VBR (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs VBR's -61.98%.
On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 11.02% vs 10.63% for SLYV. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 11.02% return vs 10.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYV.
SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.73% for VBR.
SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.05% for VBR.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYV and VBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer