SLYV vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
SLYV and IWM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SLYV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. It was launched on Sep 29, 2000. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both SLYV and IWM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SLYV or IWM.
Correlation
The correlation between SLYV and IWM is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SLYV vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SLYV:
0.48
IWM:
0.66
SLYV:
0.83
IWM:
1.05
SLYV:
1.10
IWM:
1.13
SLYV:
0.88
IWM:
0.71
SLYV:
2.12
IWM:
3.54
SLYV:
4.74%
IWM:
3.90%
SLYV:
20.89%
IWM:
21.00%
SLYV:
-61.32%
IWM:
-59.05%
SLYV:
-7.65%
IWM:
-8.62%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 11.32% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLYV having a 8.21% annualized return and IWM not far behind at 7.87%.
SLYV
7.20%
-2.63%
14.07%
7.90%
7.99%
8.21%
IWM
11.32%
-3.25%
10.71%
11.61%
7.28%
7.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLYV vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SLYV vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SLYV vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than IWM's 1.48% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.51% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.66% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% | 7.50% | 1.58% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.48% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% | 1.26% | 1.23% |
Drawdowns
SLYV vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.32%, roughly equal to the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and IWM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SLYV vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) have volatilities of 5.87% and 6.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.