PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYV vs. SLYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYV vs. SLYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly lower than SLYG's 21.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYV has underperformed SLYG with an annualized return of 10.63%, while SLYG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.75% annualized return.


SLYV

1D
-0.20%
1M
3.12%
YTD
17.70%
6M
15.50%
1Y
39.46%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
10.63%

SLYG

1D
0.35%
1M
6.00%
YTD
21.87%
6M
17.87%
1Y
34.08%
3Y*
16.89%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
11.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLYV vs. SLYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
17.70%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
21.87%5.20%9.38%17.27%-21.26%22.42%19.48%20.97%-4.20%14.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYV and SLYG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000

0.88

The correlation between SLYV and SLYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLYV vs. SLYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLYV
SLYG

Financial Services

19.5%
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%
11.0%

Technology

13.4%
19.9%

Industrials

11.6%
18.9%

Real Estate

8.6%
6.3%

Healthcare

7.3%
15.1%

Energy

7.0%
4.6%

Basic Materials

6.9%
2.8%

Communication Services

4.4%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
3.0%

Utilities

2.1%
1.8%

Financial Services

SLYV
19.5%
SLYG
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SLYV
15.4%
SLYG
11.0%

Technology

SLYV
13.4%
SLYG
19.9%

Industrials

SLYV
11.6%
SLYG
18.9%

Real Estate

SLYV
8.6%
SLYG
6.3%

Healthcare

SLYV
7.3%
SLYG
15.1%

Energy

SLYV
7.0%
SLYG
4.6%

Basic Materials

SLYV
6.9%
SLYG
2.8%

Communication Services

SLYV
4.4%
SLYG
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

SLYV
3.8%
SLYG
3.0%

Utilities

SLYV
2.1%
SLYG
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYV vs. SLYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SLYG
SLYG Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SLYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLYV vs. SLYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLYVSLYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.33

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

3.76

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.05

13.24

+0.81

SLYV vs. SLYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYV Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the SLYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYV and SLYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLYV vs. SLYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, roughly equal to the maximum SLYG drawdown of -62.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and SLYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYVSLYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.15%

-62.92%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-9.10%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.68%

-27.39%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

-29.18%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.73%

-41.86%

-5.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

0.00%

-1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-14.88%

+5.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.58%

+0.24%

Volatility

SLYV vs. SLYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) is 4.75%, while SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that SLYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYVSLYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

5.21%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

12.96%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.31%

17.96%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.91%

21.56%

+0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.98%

22.77%

+1.21%

SLYV vs. SLYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SLYV and SLYG have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLYV vs. SLYG - Dividend Comparison

SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than SLYG's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
0.88%0.86%1.22%1.18%1.18%0.68%0.71%1.08%1.06%4.74%1.13%5.75%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
2.28%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SLYV and SLYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SLYG has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to SLYV (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs SLYG's -62.92%.

On 10-year performance, SLYG leads with 11.75% vs 10.63% for SLYV. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 4.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLYG has performed better with a 11.75% return vs 10.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLYV and SLYG have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 0.88% for SLYG.

SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SLYG is Small Cap Growth Equities. SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index.

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYV and SLYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer