VTWV vs. RYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD).
VTWV and RYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VTWV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Value Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010. RYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Apr 17, 2019. Both VTWV and RYLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
VTWV vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VTWV vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 5.55% | 12.72% | 7.83% | 14.67% | -14.46% | 27.90% | 4.88% | 7.26% |
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | 1.10% | 5.65% | 10.13% | 0.27% | -13.03% | 22.13% | -0.44% | 8.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWV achieves a 5.55% return, which is significantly higher than RYLD's 1.10% return.
VTWV
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- 5.55%
- 6M
- 8.39%
- 1Y
- 28.79%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.59%
- 10Y*
- 9.64%
RYLD
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -3.62%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 12.15%
- 3Y*
- 6.22%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VTWV vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VTWV vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank
VTWV
RYLD
VTWV vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTWV | RYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 0.74 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.88 | 1.17 | +0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.19 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 0.99 | +1.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.17 | 4.78 | +3.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTWV | RYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 0.74 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.16 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.26 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWV and RYLD is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VTWV vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison
VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than RYLD's 12.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.76% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 2.03% |
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | 12.09% | 12.00% | 12.03% | 12.64% | 13.49% | 12.35% | 10.76% | 6.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VTWV vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, which is greater than RYLD's maximum drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and RYLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWV | RYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.73% | -41.53% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.90% | -12.33% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.72% | -21.33% | -5.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.82% | -3.92% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -9.04% | +1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 2.54% | +0.99% |
Volatility
VTWV vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 5.22%. This indicates that VTWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VTWV | RYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 5.22% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.23% | 9.09% | +4.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.20% | 16.39% | +5.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 14.20% | +7.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.50% | 17.38% | +6.12% |