PortfoliosLab logo
RYLD vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RYLD and QQQ is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

RYLD vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
17.38%
158.83%
RYLD
QQQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RYLD:

0.05

QQQ:

0.49

Sortino Ratio

RYLD:

0.19

QQQ:

0.85

Omega Ratio

RYLD:

1.03

QQQ:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

RYLD:

0.04

QQQ:

0.54

Martin Ratio

RYLD:

0.18

QQQ:

1.86

Ulcer Index

RYLD:

4.41%

QQQ:

6.59%

Daily Std Dev

RYLD:

17.17%

QQQ:

25.26%

Max Drawdown

RYLD:

-41.53%

QQQ:

-82.98%

Current Drawdown

RYLD:

-13.90%

QQQ:

-13.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYLD achieves a -7.72% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's -8.45% return.


RYLD

YTD

-7.72%

1M

-4.88%

6M

-4.32%

1Y

0.01%

5Y*

8.42%

10Y*

N/A

QQQ

YTD

-8.45%

1M

-5.29%

6M

-4.78%

1Y

10.24%

5Y*

17.72%

10Y*

16.49%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RYLD vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for RYLD: current value is 0.60%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
RYLD: 0.60%
Expense ratio chart for QQQ: current value is 0.20%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
QQQ: 0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RYLD vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RYLD is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RYLD is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RYLD is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RYLD is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RYLD is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RYLD is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQ is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RYLD vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for RYLD, currently valued at 0.05, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
RYLD: 0.05
QQQ: 0.49
The chart of Sortino ratio for RYLD, currently valued at 0.19, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
RYLD: 0.19
QQQ: 0.85
The chart of Omega ratio for RYLD, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
RYLD: 1.03
QQQ: 1.12
The chart of Calmar ratio for RYLD, currently valued at 0.04, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
RYLD: 0.04
QQQ: 0.54
The chart of Martin ratio for RYLD, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
RYLD: 0.18
QQQ: 1.86

The current RYLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYLD and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.05
0.49
RYLD
QQQ

Dividends

RYLD vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

RYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.36%, more than QQQ's 0.64% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
13.36%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.64%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%

Drawdowns

RYLD vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYLD drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYLD and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-13.90%
-13.25%
RYLD
QQQ

Volatility

RYLD vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) is 12.57%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 16.89%. This indicates that RYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
12.57%
16.89%
RYLD
QQQ