PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYLD vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYLD vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYLD achieves a 12.29% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.03% return.


RYLD

1D
-0.19%
1M
1.19%
6M
10.16%
YTD
12.29%
1Y
24.93%
3Y*
8.04%
5Y*
3.15%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.81%

SCHD

1D
0.18%
1M
3.33%
6M
14.09%
YTD
24.03%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
12.76%
ALL TIME*
13.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.07M$9.36M$9.08M
$786.88M$715.86M$685.58M

RYLD vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
12.29%5.65%10.13%0.27%-13.03%22.13%-0.44%8.86%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
24.03%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%9.55%

Correlation

The correlation between RYLD and SCHD is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2019

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between RYLD and SCHD has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RYLD vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RYLD
SCHD

Healthcare

20.3%
20.8%

Financial Services

17.8%
9.9%

Technology

14.5%
12.7%

Industrials

14.1%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
7.7%

Real Estate

6.8%

-

Energy

5.5%
14.1%

Basic Materials

4.4%
1.2%

Utilities

2.8%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
20.6%

Communication Services

2.2%
6.2%

Healthcare

RYLD
20.3%
SCHD
20.8%

Financial Services

RYLD
17.8%
SCHD
9.9%

Technology

RYLD
14.5%
SCHD
12.7%

Industrials

RYLD
14.1%
SCHD
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

RYLD
9.2%
SCHD
7.7%

Real Estate

RYLD
6.8%
SCHD

-

Energy

RYLD
5.5%
SCHD
14.1%

Basic Materials

RYLD
4.4%
SCHD
1.2%

Utilities

RYLD
2.8%
SCHD
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

RYLD
2.6%
SCHD
20.6%

Communication Services

RYLD
2.2%
SCHD
6.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYLD vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYLD
RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYLD vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYLDSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.51

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

6.74

-3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.02

17.01

-1.99

RYLD vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYLD and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYLD vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYLD drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYLD and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYLDSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.53%

-33.37%

-8.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.29%

-4.61%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

-16.13%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

-16.85%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-1.24%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.65%

-3.30%

-5.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

1.82%

-0.28%

Volatility

RYLD vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) is 2.07%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that RYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYLDSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.07%

4.11%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

8.11%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.67%

11.13%

-0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.97%

14.39%

-0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

16.72%

+0.32%

RYLD vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYLD vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

RYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.62%, more than SCHD's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
11.62%12.00%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.13%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYLD and SCHD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to RYLD (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYLD dropped -41.53% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 5-year performance, SCHD leads with 9.54% vs 3.15% for RYLD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, RYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 9.54% return vs 3.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RYLD.

RYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 3.13% for SCHD.

RYLD is categorized as Derivative Income, while SCHD is Dividend. RYLD tracks CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for RYLD and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYLD and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer