RYLD vs. QYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).
RYLD and QYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Apr 17, 2019. QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013. Both RYLD and QYLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RYLD or QYLD.
Correlation
The correlation between RYLD and QYLD is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
RYLD vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RYLD:
0.96
QYLD:
1.91
RYLD:
1.37
QYLD:
2.59
RYLD:
1.20
QYLD:
1.46
RYLD:
0.57
QYLD:
2.54
RYLD:
5.92
QYLD:
13.61
RYLD:
1.71%
QYLD:
1.45%
RYLD:
10.49%
QYLD:
10.33%
RYLD:
-41.52%
QYLD:
-24.75%
RYLD:
-7.95%
QYLD:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYLD achieves a 8.63% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 18.48% return.
RYLD
8.63%
-0.67%
7.22%
9.18%
2.87%
N/A
QYLD
18.48%
2.16%
9.73%
19.68%
7.22%
8.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RYLD vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RYLD and QYLD have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RYLD vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RYLD vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
RYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.08%, more than QYLD's 11.43% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | 12.08% | 12.65% | 13.50% | 12.35% | 10.77% | 6.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.43% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% | 10.74% |
Drawdowns
RYLD vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYLD drawdown since its inception was -41.52%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYLD and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RYLD vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.07%. This indicates that RYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.