PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYLD vs. SVOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RYLD vs. SVOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RYLD vs. SVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
0.70%5.65%10.13%0.27%-13.03%8.96%
SVOL
Simplify Volatility Premium ETF
-7.92%2.41%6.77%22.88%-3.30%12.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYLD achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly higher than SVOL's -7.92% return.


RYLD

1D
2.12%
1M
-3.64%
YTD
0.70%
6M
5.49%
1Y
11.70%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*

SVOL

1D
1.52%
1M
-6.10%
YTD
-7.92%
6M
-5.42%
1Y
3.66%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RYLD vs. SVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SVOL's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RYLD vs. SVOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYLD
RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

SVOL
SVOL Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYLD vs. SVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYLDSVOLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.72

0.09

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.13

0.45

+0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.06

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

0.17

+0.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.48

0.57

+3.90

RYLD vs. SVOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the SVOL Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYLD and SVOL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYLDSVOLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

0.09

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.28

-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between RYLD and SVOL is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RYLD vs. SVOL - Dividend Comparison

RYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.14%, less than SVOL's 23.14% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
12.14%12.00%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%
SVOL
Simplify Volatility Premium ETF
23.14%19.82%16.79%16.36%18.32%4.65%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RYLD vs. SVOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYLD drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, which is greater than SVOL's maximum drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYLD and SVOL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RYLDSVOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.53%

-33.50%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.33%

-24.73%

+12.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.31%

-10.30%

+5.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-4.74%

-4.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

7.46%

-4.93%

Volatility

RYLD vs. SVOL - Volatility Comparison

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) at 4.34%. This indicates that RYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RYLDSVOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

4.34%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

13.82%

-4.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.39%

38.84%

-22.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.20%

22.28%

-8.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.38%

22.28%

-4.90%