VTWO vs. RSP
VTWO (Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTWO is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTWO returned 11.07%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for RSP. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTWO charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.
Performance
VTWO vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWO achieves a 17.08% return, which is significantly higher than RSP's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, VTWO has underperformed RSP with an annualized return of 11.07%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.86% annualized return.
VTWO
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 17.08%
- 6M
- 15.89%
- 1Y
- 39.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
RSP
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
VTWO vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 17.08% | 12.90% | 11.55% | 17.08% | -20.49% | 14.79% | 20.22% | 25.81% | -11.15% | 14.69% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 9.70% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.66% | 28.91% | -7.84% | 18.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWO and RSP is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010 | 0.89 |
The correlation between VTWO and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTWO vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTWO
RSP
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
VTWO
RSP
Technology
VTWO
RSP
Healthcare
VTWO
RSP
Financial Services
VTWO
RSP
Consumer Cyclical
VTWO
RSP
Real Estate
VTWO
RSP
Energy
VTWO
RSP
Basic Materials
VTWO
RSP
Utilities
VTWO
RSP
Communication Services
VTWO
RSP
Consumer Defensive
VTWO
RSP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTWO vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank
VTWO
RSP
VTWO vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTWO | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.07 | 1.70 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.88 | 2.47 | +0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.30 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 2.49 | +1.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.79 | 9.48 | +3.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTWO | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 1.70 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.52 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.65 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.57 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
VTWO vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWO drawdown since its inception was -41.19%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWO and RSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWO | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.19% | -59.92% | +18.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.99% | -7.85% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.57% | -17.81% | -9.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.88% | -21.38% | -10.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.19% | -39.04% | -2.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -0.38% | -1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.39% | -6.65% | -1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 2.06% | +1.02% |
Volatility
VTWO vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.56%. This indicates that VTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTWO | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 2.56% | +3.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.50% | 8.29% | +5.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.12% | 11.56% | +7.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.48% | 16.18% | +6.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 18.35% | +4.73% |
VTWO vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTWO vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
VTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than RSP's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 1.08% | 1.25% | 1.21% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.13% | 0.92% | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTWO and RSP have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTWO has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to RSP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWO dropped -41.19% vs RSP's -59.92%.
On 10-year performance, RSP leads with 11.86% vs 11.07% for VTWO. On fees, VTWO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RSP has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 11.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTWO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.
RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.08% for VTWO.
VTWO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWO and 0.20% for RSP.
VTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTWO and RSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer