VTWO vs. RDTE
VTWO (Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF) and RDTE (Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTWO is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index, while RDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. VTWO is passively managed, while RDTE is actively managed. Over the past year, VTWO returned 41.90% vs 29.84% for RDTE. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VTWO charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for RDTE.
Performance
VTWO vs. RDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWO achieves a 18.87% return, which is significantly higher than RDTE's 13.89% return.
VTWO
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- YTD
- 18.87%
- 6M
- 16.64%
- 1Y
- 41.90%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
RDTE
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 13.89%
- 6M
- 12.63%
- 1Y
- 29.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTWO vs. RDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 18.87% | 12.90% | 6.76% |
RDTE Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 13.89% | 9.46% | 8.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWO and RDTE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between VTWO and RDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTWO vs. RDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTWO
RDTE
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
VTWO
RDTE
-
Technology
VTWO
RDTE
-
Healthcare
VTWO
RDTE
-
Financial Services
VTWO
RDTE
Consumer Cyclical
VTWO
RDTE
-
Real Estate
VTWO
RDTE
-
Energy
VTWO
RDTE
-
Basic Materials
VTWO
RDTE
-
Utilities
VTWO
RDTE
-
Communication Services
VTWO
RDTE
-
Consumer Defensive
VTWO
RDTE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTWO vs. RDTE — Risk / Return Rank
VTWO
RDTE
VTWO vs. RDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTWO | RDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.30 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | 3.27 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.62 | 11.37 | +2.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTWO | RDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 1.79 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 1.01 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
VTWO vs. RDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWO drawdown since its inception was -41.19%, which is greater than RDTE's maximum drawdown of -24.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWO and RDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWO | RDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.19% | -24.32% | -16.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.99% | -9.17% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.05% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.39% | -4.66% | -3.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 2.63% | +0.45% |
Volatility
VTWO vs. RDTE - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) at 4.98%. This indicates that VTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTWO | RDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 4.98% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.57% | 12.37% | +1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.12% | 16.73% | +2.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.49% | 19.17% | +3.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 19.17% | +3.91% |
VTWO vs. RDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than RDTE's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTWO vs. RDTE - Dividend Comparison
VTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than RDTE's 46.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDTE Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 46.02% | 50.16% | 10.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 1.07% | 1.25% | 1.21% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.13% | 0.92% | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, VTWO and RDTE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTWO has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to RDTE (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWO dropped -41.19% vs RDTE's -24.32%.
On 1-year performance, VTWO leads with 41.90% vs 29.84% for RDTE. On fees, VTWO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, RDTE has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VTWO has performed better with a 41.90% return vs 29.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTWO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RDTE.
RDTE has the higher dividend yield at 46.02%, compared with 1.07% for VTWO.
VTWO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RDTE is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VTWO and 0.95% for RDTE.
VTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTWO and RDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer