RDTE vs. QDTE

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RDTE (Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RDTE returned 30.49% vs 33.64% for QDTE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.97% expense ratio.

Performance

RDTE vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDTE achieves a 16.99% return, which is significantly higher than QDTE's 12.61% return.

RDTE

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 5.32%
• YTD: 16.99%
• 6M: 14.85%
• 1Y: 30.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDTE

• 1D: -3.23%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: 12.61%
• 6M: 11.52%
• 1Y: 33.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDTE vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RDTE Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	16.99%	9.46%	8.32%
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	12.61%	19.32%	11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between RDTE and QDTE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024	0.70

The correlation between RDTE and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RDTE vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDTE

RDTE Risk / Return Rank: 58
RDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
RDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
RDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 49
RDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
RDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 66

QDTE

QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 64
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 62
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDTE vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDTE	QDTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	2.03	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	2.58	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.36	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	3.31	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.57	12.82	-1.25

RDTE vs. QDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the QDTE Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDTE and QDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RDTE vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTE drawdown since its inception was -24.32%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTE and QDTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDTE	QDTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.32%	-22.86%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.17%	-10.20%	+1.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.88%	-3.55%	+2.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.55%	-3.13%	-1.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	2.63%	+0.01%

Volatility

RDTE vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) is 6.08%, while Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that RDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDTE	QDTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.08%	8.57%	-2.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.07%	13.32%	-0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.25%	16.68%	+0.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.30%	18.99%	+0.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.30%	18.99%	+0.31%

RDTE vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RDTE and QDTE have an expense ratio of 0.97%.

Dividends

RDTE vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

RDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.14%, which matches QDTE's 44.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	44.23%	49.49%	32.09%
RDTE Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	44.14%	50.16%	10.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDTE and QDTE in my portfolio?

RDTE and QDTE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RDTE or QDTE?

QDTE has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to RDTE (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDTE dropped -24.32% vs QDTE's -22.86%.

Which ETF is better, RDTE or QDTE?

On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 33.64% vs 30.49% for RDTE. Both ETFs have the same 0.97% expense ratio. On volatility, RDTE has been the lower-risk option at 6.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RDTE or QDTE?

Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 33.64% return vs 30.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDTE or QDTE?

RDTE and QDTE have the same expense ratio: 0.97% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDTE or QDTE?

QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 44.23%, compared with 44.14% for RDTE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.