RDTE vs. IWMI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RDTE (Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and IWMI (NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RDTE returned 29.85% vs 32.94% for IWMI. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RDTE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for IWMI.

Performance

RDTE vs. IWMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDTE achieves a 18.19% return, which is significantly higher than IWMI's 15.60% return.

RDTE

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -0.26%
• 6M: 13.52%
• YTD: 18.19%
• 1Y: 29.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.59%

IWMI

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: -1.52%
• 6M: 11.05%
• YTD: 15.60%
• 1Y: 32.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	$20.57M	$19.53M	$18.04M
RDTE Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	$2.51M	$2.81M	$3.00M

RDTE vs. IWMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RDTE Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	18.19%	9.46%	8.32%
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	15.60%	14.97%	5.17%

Correlation

The correlation between RDTE and IWMI is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024	0.94

The correlation between RDTE and IWMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RDTE vs. IWMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RDTE

RDTE Risk / Return Rank: 74
RDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
RDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
RDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
RDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
RDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 81

IWMI

IWMI Risk / Return Rank: 87
IWMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
IWMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
IWMI Omega Ratio Rank: 82
IWMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IWMI Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RDTE vs. IWMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDTE	IWMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	2.00	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	2.82	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.35	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	3.65	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.53	15.05	-4.52

RDTE vs. IWMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the IWMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDTE and IWMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RDTE vs. IWMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTE drawdown since its inception was -24.32%, roughly equal to the maximum IWMI drawdown of -23.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTE and IWMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDTE	IWMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.32%	-23.88%	-0.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.17%	-8.40%	-0.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.96%	-2.14%	+1.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.34%	-3.88%	-0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	2.04%	+0.57%

Volatility

RDTE vs. IWMI - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) have volatilities of 3.63% and 3.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDTE	IWMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.63%	3.53%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.97%	11.67%	+1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.05%	15.40%	+1.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.94%	17.66%	+1.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.94%	17.66%	+1.28%

RDTE vs. IWMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than IWMI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

RDTE vs. IWMI - Dividend Comparison

RDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.32%, more than IWMI's 13.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	13.84%	14.05%	8.78%
RDTE Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	44.32%	50.16%	10.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDTE and IWMI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, RDTE and IWMI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RDTE or IWMI?

RDTE has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to IWMI (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDTE dropped -24.32% vs IWMI's -23.88%.

Which ETF is better, RDTE or IWMI?

On 1-year performance, IWMI leads with 32.94% vs 29.85% for RDTE. On fees, IWMI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, IWMI has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RDTE or IWMI?

Over the 1-year period, IWMI has performed better with a 32.94% return vs 29.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDTE or IWMI?

IWMI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for RDTE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDTE or IWMI?

RDTE has the higher dividend yield at 44.32%, compared with 13.84% for IWMI.

What is the main difference between RDTE and IWMI?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for RDTE and 0.68% for IWMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.