RDTE vs. IWMY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RDTE (Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and IWMY (Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while IWMY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RDTE returned 29.85% vs 19.50% for IWMY. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RDTE charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for IWMY.

Performance

RDTE vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDTE achieves a 18.19% return, which is significantly higher than IWMY's 13.35% return.

RDTE

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -0.26%
• 6M: 13.52%
• YTD: 18.19%
• 1Y: 29.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.59%

IWMY

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -1.97%
• 6M: 9.10%
• YTD: 13.35%
• 1Y: 19.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IWMY Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF	$636.13K	$744.03K	$1.04M
RDTE Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	$2.51M	$2.81M	$3.00M

RDTE vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RDTE Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	18.19%	9.46%	8.32%
IWMY Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF	13.35%	10.18%	2.53%

Correlation

The correlation between RDTE and IWMY is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024	0.92

The correlation between RDTE and IWMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RDTE vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RDTE

RDTE Risk / Return Rank: 74
RDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
RDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
RDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
RDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
RDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 81

IWMY

IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 44
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 43
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RDTE vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDTE	IWMY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	1.12	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	1.59	+0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.20	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	1.58	+1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.53	5.12	+5.41

RDTE vs. IWMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the IWMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDTE and IWMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RDTE vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTE drawdown since its inception was -24.32%, which is greater than IWMY's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTE and IWMY.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDTE	IWMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.32%	-18.72%	-5.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.17%	-11.57%	+2.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.96%	-2.64%	+1.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.34%	-2.88%	-1.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	3.56%	-0.95%

Volatility

RDTE vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY) at 3.40%. This indicates that RDTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDTE	IWMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.63%	3.40%	+0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.97%	13.46%	-0.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.05%	16.30%	+0.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.94%	15.78%	+3.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.94%	15.78%	+3.16%

RDTE vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMY's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

RDTE vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison

RDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.32%, more than IWMY's 41.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IWMY Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF	41.85%	63.33%	107.92%	11.34%
RDTE Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	44.32%	50.16%	10.70%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDTE and IWMY in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, RDTE and IWMY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RDTE or IWMY?

RDTE has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to IWMY (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDTE dropped -24.32% vs IWMY's -18.72%.

Which ETF is better, RDTE or IWMY?

On 1-year performance, RDTE leads with 29.85% vs 19.50% for IWMY. On fees, RDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, IWMY has been the lower-risk option at 3.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RDTE or IWMY?

Over the 1-year period, RDTE has performed better with a 29.85% return vs 19.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDTE or IWMY?

RDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for IWMY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDTE or IWMY?

RDTE has the higher dividend yield at 44.32%, compared with 41.85% for IWMY.

What is the main difference between RDTE and IWMY?

RDTE is categorized as Derivative Income, while IWMY is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for RDTE and 1.05% for IWMY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.